The effect of sustainable low-dose sildenafil and cognitive-behavioral training on sexual function in methadone-treated men-a randomized controlled trial.
{"title":"The effect of sustainable low-dose sildenafil and cognitive-behavioral training on sexual function in methadone-treated men-a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Negah Tavakolifard, Zahra Amini","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2023.2186763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sexual dysfunction caused by opioids is one of the serious problems of drug misusers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of continuous low-dose sildenafil treatment alongside psychological training on the sexual function of methadone-treated patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted on methadone-treated men with sexual dysfunction. Patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups: sildenafil 25 mg and psychological training. Sexual Quality of Life-Men, Sexual Self-Efficacy Scale-Erectile, and the International Index of Erectile Function were used before and 4 weeks after the end of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 67 couples were included in the study (34 psychological interventions <i>vs.</i> 33 sildenafil group). After 4 weeks of treatment, the mean of male erectile function (33.73 ± 8.114 and 27.62 ± 6.238, <i>p</i> = 0.003) and sexual self-efficacy score (78.36 ± 12.713 and 69.62 ± 14.940, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) in the sildenafil group were statistically significant compared to the psychological group, however, the sexual quality score of the two groups was not statistically significant (31.48 ± 9.216 and 31.71 ± 11.333, <i>p</i> = 0.342).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sexual function of methadone-treated men in both groups was significantly improved, yet this difference was significantly greater in the pharmaceutical treatment group than the trainings. As a result, due to the high need for treatment, any type of intervention (medication or psychotherapy) will be effective in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"230-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2023.2186763","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sexual dysfunction caused by opioids is one of the serious problems of drug misusers.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of continuous low-dose sildenafil treatment alongside psychological training on the sexual function of methadone-treated patients.
Method: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on methadone-treated men with sexual dysfunction. Patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups: sildenafil 25 mg and psychological training. Sexual Quality of Life-Men, Sexual Self-Efficacy Scale-Erectile, and the International Index of Erectile Function were used before and 4 weeks after the end of the intervention.
Results: A total of 67 couples were included in the study (34 psychological interventions vs. 33 sildenafil group). After 4 weeks of treatment, the mean of male erectile function (33.73 ± 8.114 and 27.62 ± 6.238, p = 0.003) and sexual self-efficacy score (78.36 ± 12.713 and 69.62 ± 14.940, p < 0.0001) in the sildenafil group were statistically significant compared to the psychological group, however, the sexual quality score of the two groups was not statistically significant (31.48 ± 9.216 and 31.71 ± 11.333, p = 0.342).
Conclusions: The sexual function of methadone-treated men in both groups was significantly improved, yet this difference was significantly greater in the pharmaceutical treatment group than the trainings. As a result, due to the high need for treatment, any type of intervention (medication or psychotherapy) will be effective in these patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Addictive Diseases is an essential, comprehensive resource covering the full range of addictions for today"s addiction professional. This in-depth, practical journal helps you stay on top of the vital issues and the clinical skills necessary to ensure effective practice. The latest research, treatments, and public policy issues in addiction medicine are presented in a fully integrated, multi-specialty perspective. Top researchers and respected leaders in addiction issues share their knowledge and insights to keep you up-to-date on the most important research and practical applications.