Social interaction can function as a reinforcer for dogs: Effects of stimulus duration and session parameters

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Erica N. Feuerbacher, Caitlin Togher, Jonathan E. Friedel
{"title":"Social interaction can function as a reinforcer for dogs: Effects of stimulus duration and session parameters","authors":"Erica N. Feuerbacher,&nbsp;Caitlin Togher,&nbsp;Jonathan E. Friedel","doi":"10.1002/jeab.842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prior research has produced mixed results on whether human social interaction can function as a reinforcer for dog behavior. However, that research used either short durations of social interaction or rapid, repeated trials such that satiation could have been a factor. We investigated whether two durations of social interaction (30 s or 4 s petting plus vocal praise) would maintain more responding than extinction, than each other, or than food. We limited each session to 10 trials and temporally spaced sessions within and across days. Both durations of social interaction produced more responding than extinction, but there was no difference in responding between the two social interaction durations. When we compared responding in food sessions to 30-s and 4-s social interaction sessions, we could not determine differences in responses emitted per session for two dogs due to ceiling effects, but the third dog doubled her responding when food was provided. Additionally, latencies in food sessions for all dogs were significantly lower than expected from a random sampling of latencies. Our results suggest both durations of social interaction can function as a reinforcer, especially when delivered sporadically, but they are still not as effective as food as a reinforcer for most dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeab.842","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeab.842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior research has produced mixed results on whether human social interaction can function as a reinforcer for dog behavior. However, that research used either short durations of social interaction or rapid, repeated trials such that satiation could have been a factor. We investigated whether two durations of social interaction (30 s or 4 s petting plus vocal praise) would maintain more responding than extinction, than each other, or than food. We limited each session to 10 trials and temporally spaced sessions within and across days. Both durations of social interaction produced more responding than extinction, but there was no difference in responding between the two social interaction durations. When we compared responding in food sessions to 30-s and 4-s social interaction sessions, we could not determine differences in responses emitted per session for two dogs due to ceiling effects, but the third dog doubled her responding when food was provided. Additionally, latencies in food sessions for all dogs were significantly lower than expected from a random sampling of latencies. Our results suggest both durations of social interaction can function as a reinforcer, especially when delivered sporadically, but they are still not as effective as food as a reinforcer for most dogs.

Abstract Image

社会互动对狗的强化作用:刺激持续时间和会话参数的影响
先前的研究对人类的社会互动是否可以作为狗的行为的强化物产生了不同的结果。然而,该研究要么使用了短时间的社会互动,要么使用了快速重复的试验,这样饱足感可能是一个因素。我们调查了两种持续时间的社会互动(30秒或40秒爱抚加口头表扬)是否比灭绝、比彼此或比食物保持更多的反应。我们将每次试验限制为10次,并在几天内和几天内暂时间隔。两种社会互动的持续时间都产生了更多的反应,而不是灭绝,但两种社会互动的持续时间之间的反应没有差异。当我们比较了30-s和4-s社会互动的反应时,由于天花板效应,我们无法确定两只狗在每次会话中发出的反应的差异,但第三只狗在提供食物时的反应翻了一番。此外,所有狗在食物环节的潜伏期都明显低于随机抽样的预期。我们的研究结果表明,这两种社会互动的持续时间都可以作为强化物,尤其是在偶尔进行的时候,但对大多数狗来说,它们仍然不如食物作为强化物那么有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior is primarily for the original publication of experiments relevant to the behavior of individual organisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信