The reading profiles of late elementary English learners with and without risk for dyslexia

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Jeremy Miciak, Yusra Ahmed, Phil Capin, David J. Francis
{"title":"The reading profiles of late elementary English learners with and without risk for dyslexia","authors":"Jeremy Miciak,&nbsp;Yusra Ahmed,&nbsp;Phil Capin,&nbsp;David J. Francis","doi":"10.1007/s11881-022-00254-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\n</h2><div><p>Few studies have systematically investigated the reading skill profiles of English learners (ELs) in late elementary school, a critical developmental period for language and literacy and the most common grades for initial identification with specific learning disabilities (O’Connor et al., <i>Learning Disabilities Research &amp; Practice, 28</i>(3), 98–112, 2013). We investigated the reading skill profiles of 331 ELs in 3rd and 4th grades, including ELs with and without risk for dyslexia due to significant deficits in word and pseudo-word reading accuracy and fluency. We utilized latent profile analysis and factor mixture modeling to investigate (1) the nature and distribution of reading skill profiles; (2) whether these profiles were associated with differences in reading comprehension growth across one academic year; and (3) the stability of reading profiles across an academic year. We selected a two-class solution (reading disabled and typically developing) based on model fit indices, theoretical considerations, pattern of results across profile-solutions and time-points, and parameterizations, making the approach stronger and more generalizable. These classes demonstrated clear, consistent differences in performance across reading component skills, with the RD class scoring consistently below the TD class across code-based and meaning-based domains of reading. Across the year, the TD class demonstrated significantly higher patterns of growth in reading comprehension (χ<sup>2</sup> (1) = 206.21, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Class membership was largely stable (97% of participants maintain class membership). These results suggest that ELs with risk for dyslexia demonstrate multiple component skill deficits that may require long-term, comprehensive, intensive interventions to remediate.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"72 2","pages":"276 - 300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351011/pdf/nihms-1810713.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-022-00254-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract

Few studies have systematically investigated the reading skill profiles of English learners (ELs) in late elementary school, a critical developmental period for language and literacy and the most common grades for initial identification with specific learning disabilities (O’Connor et al., Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(3), 98–112, 2013). We investigated the reading skill profiles of 331 ELs in 3rd and 4th grades, including ELs with and without risk for dyslexia due to significant deficits in word and pseudo-word reading accuracy and fluency. We utilized latent profile analysis and factor mixture modeling to investigate (1) the nature and distribution of reading skill profiles; (2) whether these profiles were associated with differences in reading comprehension growth across one academic year; and (3) the stability of reading profiles across an academic year. We selected a two-class solution (reading disabled and typically developing) based on model fit indices, theoretical considerations, pattern of results across profile-solutions and time-points, and parameterizations, making the approach stronger and more generalizable. These classes demonstrated clear, consistent differences in performance across reading component skills, with the RD class scoring consistently below the TD class across code-based and meaning-based domains of reading. Across the year, the TD class demonstrated significantly higher patterns of growth in reading comprehension (χ2 (1) = 206.21, p < 0.001). Class membership was largely stable (97% of participants maintain class membership). These results suggest that ELs with risk for dyslexia demonstrate multiple component skill deficits that may require long-term, comprehensive, intensive interventions to remediate.

Abstract Image

有阅读障碍风险和无阅读障碍风险的小学后期英语学习者的阅读概况
摘要很少有研究系统地调查英语学习者在小学后期的阅读技能状况,这是语言和识字的关键发展时期,也是最初识别特定学习障碍的最常见成绩(O’Connor et al.,learning disabilities Research&Practice,28(3),98-1122013)。我们调查了331名三年级和四年级英语学习者的阅读技能状况,包括因单词和伪单词阅读准确性和流利性显著不足而有阅读障碍风险和无阅读障碍风险的英语学习者。我们采用潜在特征分析和因素混合模型来研究(1)阅读技能特征的性质和分布;(2) 这些概况是否与一学年内阅读理解增长的差异有关;以及(3)一学年内阅读资料的稳定性。我们根据模型拟合指数、理论考虑、剖面解决方案和时间点的结果模式以及参数化,选择了一个两类解决方案(阅读禁用和通常正在开发),使该方法更加强大和可推广。这些课程在阅读组成部分技能的表现上表现出明显、一致的差异,在基于代码和基于意义的阅读领域,RD课程的得分始终低于TD课程。在一年中,TD班在阅读理解方面表现出显著更高的增长模式(χ2(1) = 206.21页 <; 0.001)。班级成员基本稳定(97%的参与者保持班级成员身份)。这些结果表明,有阅读障碍风险的ELs表现出多组分技能缺陷,可能需要长期、全面、强化的干预措施来补救。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信