Profiles of Suicidal Ideation Among Black Male Adolescents: Examination of Individual and Socioecological Predictors.

IF 4.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Noni K Gaylord-Harden, Tamika Gilreath, Amanda Burnside, Pimaa Mintah, Michael A Lindsey
{"title":"Profiles of Suicidal Ideation Among Black Male Adolescents: Examination of Individual and Socioecological Predictors.","authors":"Noni K Gaylord-Harden, Tamika Gilreath, Amanda Burnside, Pimaa Mintah, Michael A Lindsey","doi":"10.1080/15374416.2023.2222395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study utilized latent profile analysis to identify distinct profiles of suicidal ideation among Black male adolescents and compared profiles on socioecological determinants of suicide and psychological symptoms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A sample of 457 Black male adolescents (mean age = 15.31, SD = 1.26) completed self-report measures of suicidal ideation, racial discrimination, community violence exposure, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, and posttraumatic stress symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results of the latent profile analysis revealed a three-profile model: a low ideation profile, with low levels of all forms of suicidal ideation; a general death ideation profile with elevated general thoughts of death and dying; and a high, concealed ideation profile with high levels on all suicidal ideation items, except communicating the ideation to others. ANOVAs revealed that levels of psychological symptoms were significantly different for each profile, with the high, concealed ideation profile showing the highest levels. The low ideation profile had significantly lower scores than the two other profiles on community violence exposure, but the other two profiles did not differ significantly from one another. Further, the general death ideation profile had significantly higher scores on racial discrimination than the other two profiles, but the other two profiles did not differ significantly from one another.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study supports recent socio-cultural theories of suicidal ideation and behavior in Black youth and highlights the need for increased access to care and services for Black boys who are exposed to socioecological factors that heighten suicidal ideation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"878-892"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2023.2222395","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The current study utilized latent profile analysis to identify distinct profiles of suicidal ideation among Black male adolescents and compared profiles on socioecological determinants of suicide and psychological symptoms.

Method: A sample of 457 Black male adolescents (mean age = 15.31, SD = 1.26) completed self-report measures of suicidal ideation, racial discrimination, community violence exposure, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, and posttraumatic stress symptoms.

Results: Results of the latent profile analysis revealed a three-profile model: a low ideation profile, with low levels of all forms of suicidal ideation; a general death ideation profile with elevated general thoughts of death and dying; and a high, concealed ideation profile with high levels on all suicidal ideation items, except communicating the ideation to others. ANOVAs revealed that levels of psychological symptoms were significantly different for each profile, with the high, concealed ideation profile showing the highest levels. The low ideation profile had significantly lower scores than the two other profiles on community violence exposure, but the other two profiles did not differ significantly from one another. Further, the general death ideation profile had significantly higher scores on racial discrimination than the other two profiles, but the other two profiles did not differ significantly from one another.

Conclusions: The current study supports recent socio-cultural theories of suicidal ideation and behavior in Black youth and highlights the need for increased access to care and services for Black boys who are exposed to socioecological factors that heighten suicidal ideation.

黑人男性青少年自杀倾向的概况:对个人和社会生态预测因素的研究。
目的:本研究利用潜在特征分析确定黑人男性青少年自杀意念的独特特征,并比较自杀和心理症状的社会生态决定因素特征:本研究利用潜在特征分析确定黑人男性青少年自杀意念的独特特征,并比较自杀的社会生态决定因素和心理症状的特征:457名黑人男性青少年(平均年龄=15.31岁,SD=1.26)完成了自杀意念、种族歧视、社区暴力暴露、焦虑症状、抑郁症状和创伤后应激症状的自我报告测量:潜在特征分析结果显示了三个特征模型:低意念特征,所有形式的自杀意念水平都很低;一般死亡意念特征,对死亡和垂死的一般想法较高;高隐蔽意念特征,所有自杀意念项目的水平都很高,但不包括将意念传达给他人。方差分析显示,每种特征的心理症状水平都有显著差异,其中高隐蔽意念特征的心理症状水平最高。在社区暴力暴露方面,低意念特征的得分明显低于其他两个特征,但其他两个特征之间没有明显差异。此外,一般死亡意念特征在种族歧视方面的得分明显高于其他两个特征,但其他两个特征之间没有明显差异:目前的研究支持最近关于黑人青少年自杀意念和行为的社会文化理论,并强调需要增加黑人男孩获得护理和服务的机会,因为他们面临的社会生态因素会加剧自杀意念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (JCCAP) is the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association. It publishes original contributions on the following topics: (a) the development and evaluation of assessment and intervention techniques for use with clinical child and adolescent populations; (b) the development and maintenance of clinical child and adolescent problems; (c) cross-cultural and sociodemographic issues that have a clear bearing on clinical child and adolescent psychology in terms of theory, research, or practice; and (d) training and professional practice in clinical child and adolescent psychology, as well as child advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信