Intervention targeting different visual attention span components in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia: a study based on Bundesen’s theory of visual attention

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Xiaoyu Ren, Jie Li, Jinqiu Liu, Duo Liu, Jing Zhao
{"title":"Intervention targeting different visual attention span components in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia: a study based on Bundesen’s theory of visual attention","authors":"Xiaoyu Ren,&nbsp;Jie Li,&nbsp;Jinqiu Liu,&nbsp;Duo Liu,&nbsp;Jing Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s11881-023-00288-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Within the framework of the theory of visual attention (TVA), the visual attention span (VAS) deficit among individuals with developmental dyslexia has been ascribed to the problems entailed by bottom–up (BotU) and top–down (TopD) attentional processes. The former involves two VAS subcomponents: the visual short-term memory storage and perceptual processing speed; the latter consists of the spatial bias of attentional weight and the inhibitory control. Then, what about the influences of the BotU and TopD components on reading? Are there differences in the roles of the two types of attentional processes in reading? This study addresses these issues by using two types of training tasks separately, corresponding to the BotU and TopD attentional components. Three groups of Chinese children with dyslexia—15 children each in the BotU training, TopD training, and non-trained active control groups were recruited here. Participants completed reading measures and a CombiTVA task which was used to estimate VAS subcomponents, before and after the training procedure. Results showed that BotU training improved both the within-category and between-category VAS subcomponents and sentence reading performance; meanwhile, TopD training enhanced character reading fluency through improving spatial attention capacity. Moreover, benefits on attentional capacities and reading skills in the two training groups were generally maintained three months after the intervention. The present findings revealed diverse patterns in the influences of VAS on reading within the TVA framework, which contributes to enriching the understanding of VAS-reading relation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"73 3","pages":"487 - 509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-023-00288-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within the framework of the theory of visual attention (TVA), the visual attention span (VAS) deficit among individuals with developmental dyslexia has been ascribed to the problems entailed by bottom–up (BotU) and top–down (TopD) attentional processes. The former involves two VAS subcomponents: the visual short-term memory storage and perceptual processing speed; the latter consists of the spatial bias of attentional weight and the inhibitory control. Then, what about the influences of the BotU and TopD components on reading? Are there differences in the roles of the two types of attentional processes in reading? This study addresses these issues by using two types of training tasks separately, corresponding to the BotU and TopD attentional components. Three groups of Chinese children with dyslexia—15 children each in the BotU training, TopD training, and non-trained active control groups were recruited here. Participants completed reading measures and a CombiTVA task which was used to estimate VAS subcomponents, before and after the training procedure. Results showed that BotU training improved both the within-category and between-category VAS subcomponents and sentence reading performance; meanwhile, TopD training enhanced character reading fluency through improving spatial attention capacity. Moreover, benefits on attentional capacities and reading skills in the two training groups were generally maintained three months after the intervention. The present findings revealed diverse patterns in the influences of VAS on reading within the TVA framework, which contributes to enriching the understanding of VAS-reading relation.

Abstract Image

针对中国发育性阅读障碍儿童不同视觉注意广度成分的干预:基于Bundesen视觉注意理论的研究。
在视觉注意理论(TVA)的框架内,发育性阅读障碍个体的视觉注意广度(VAS)缺陷被归因于自下而上(BotU)和自上而下(TopD)注意过程所带来的问题。前者涉及两个子成分:视觉短期记忆存储和感知处理速度;后者包括注意权重的空间偏差和抑制控制。那么,BotU和TopD成分对阅读的影响是什么呢?这两种注意力过程在阅读中的作用是否存在差异?本研究通过分别使用两种类型的训练任务来解决这些问题,这两种类型对应于BotU和TopD注意力成分。这里招募了三组中国阅读障碍儿童,分别为15名接受BotU训练、TopD训练和未接受训练的主动对照组的儿童。参与者在培训程序前后完成了阅读测量和CombiTVA任务,该任务用于评估VAS子成分。结果表明,BotU训练提高了类内和类间VAS子成分和句子阅读成绩;同时,TopD训练通过提高空间注意能力来提高汉字阅读的流畅性。此外,两个训练组的注意力能力和阅读技能在干预后三个月通常保持不变。本研究结果揭示了在TVA框架内VAS对阅读影响的不同模式,有助于丰富对VAS阅读关系的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信