Caring for patients with substance use disorders: a qualitative investigation of difficulties encountered by hospital-based clinicians.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Journal of Addictive Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-27 DOI:10.1080/10550887.2023.2227307
Sophie Paroz, Martine Monnat, Francesco Panese, Michael Saraga, Jean-Bernard Daeppen
{"title":"Caring for patients with substance use disorders: a qualitative investigation of difficulties encountered by hospital-based clinicians.","authors":"Sophie Paroz, Martine Monnat, Francesco Panese, Michael Saraga, Jean-Bernard Daeppen","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2023.2227307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Caring for patients with substance use disorders (SUD) is held in low regard and many clinicians resist treating them. To address this situation, numerous research projects assessed training program gaps and professional attitudes. In contrast, this study explored the actual clinical difficulties that a variety of hospital-based professionals encounter when treating patients with SUD. <b>Methods:</b> Qualitative multiple method design including: (1) individual semi-structured interviews with SUD experts and educators; (2) video-elicited, cross self-confrontation interviews with clinicians working in a specialist addiction unit; (3) paired semi-structured interviews with clinicians working in non-specialist units. Participants were recruited within one university hospital. Data collected at stages (1) and (3) relied on an interview guide and were analyzed using conventional content analyses. Data collected at stage (2) consisted of discussions of video recorded clinical interviews and were analyzed based on a participatory approach. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-three clinicians from seven hospital units participated. Forty-four difficulties were reported that we classified into six categories: knowledge-based; moral; technical; relational; identity-related; institutional. We identified seven cross-category themes as key features of SUD clinical complexity: exacerbation of patient characteristics; multiplication of medical issues; hybridity and specificity of medical discipline; experiences of stalemate, adversity, and role reversal. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our study, providing a comprehensive analysis of the difficulties of caring for patients with SUD, reveals a highly challenging clinical practice for a diversity of healthcare providers. They represent a complementary approach to addressing resistance as an important feature of a complex clinical system, and valuable material to discussing professional preparedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"12-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2023.2227307","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Caring for patients with substance use disorders (SUD) is held in low regard and many clinicians resist treating them. To address this situation, numerous research projects assessed training program gaps and professional attitudes. In contrast, this study explored the actual clinical difficulties that a variety of hospital-based professionals encounter when treating patients with SUD. Methods: Qualitative multiple method design including: (1) individual semi-structured interviews with SUD experts and educators; (2) video-elicited, cross self-confrontation interviews with clinicians working in a specialist addiction unit; (3) paired semi-structured interviews with clinicians working in non-specialist units. Participants were recruited within one university hospital. Data collected at stages (1) and (3) relied on an interview guide and were analyzed using conventional content analyses. Data collected at stage (2) consisted of discussions of video recorded clinical interviews and were analyzed based on a participatory approach. Results: Twenty-three clinicians from seven hospital units participated. Forty-four difficulties were reported that we classified into six categories: knowledge-based; moral; technical; relational; identity-related; institutional. We identified seven cross-category themes as key features of SUD clinical complexity: exacerbation of patient characteristics; multiplication of medical issues; hybridity and specificity of medical discipline; experiences of stalemate, adversity, and role reversal. Conclusions: Our study, providing a comprehensive analysis of the difficulties of caring for patients with SUD, reveals a highly challenging clinical practice for a diversity of healthcare providers. They represent a complementary approach to addressing resistance as an important feature of a complex clinical system, and valuable material to discussing professional preparedness.

照顾有物质使用障碍的病人:对医院临床医生遇到的困难进行定性调查。
背景:对物质使用障碍(SUD)患者的护理不被重视,许多临床医生拒绝治疗他们。为了解决这种情况,许多研究项目评估了培训计划的差距和专业态度。相比之下,本研究探讨了各种医院专业人员在治疗SUD患者时遇到的实际临床困难。方法:定性多方法设计,包括:(1)对SUD专家和教育工作者进行个别半结构化访谈;(2)对成瘾专科单位的临床医生进行视频诱导的交叉自我对抗访谈;(3)与非专科单位的临床医生进行配对半结构化访谈。参与者是在一所大学医院招募的。在阶段(1)和(3)收集的数据依赖于采访指南,并使用传统的内容分析进行分析。在阶段(2)收集的数据包括视频记录临床访谈的讨论,并基于参与式方法进行分析。结果:来自7个医院单位的23名临床医生参与了研究。报告了44个困难,我们将其分为六类:知识型;道德;技术;关系;标志;机构。我们确定了七个跨类别主题作为SUD临床复杂性的关键特征:患者特征恶化;医疗问题的倍增;医学学科的杂交性与特殊性僵局、逆境和角色转换的经历。结论:我们的研究全面分析了护理SUD患者的困难,揭示了各种医疗保健提供者在临床实践中面临的高度挑战。它们代表了将耐药性作为复杂临床系统的一个重要特征来解决的一种补充方法,也是讨论专业准备的宝贵材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Addictive Diseases is an essential, comprehensive resource covering the full range of addictions for today"s addiction professional. This in-depth, practical journal helps you stay on top of the vital issues and the clinical skills necessary to ensure effective practice. The latest research, treatments, and public policy issues in addiction medicine are presented in a fully integrated, multi-specialty perspective. Top researchers and respected leaders in addiction issues share their knowledge and insights to keep you up-to-date on the most important research and practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信