A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the sibling perception questionnaire.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Abbigail Gutierrez, Madeline Horan, Christine A Limbers
{"title":"A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the sibling perception questionnaire.","authors":"Abbigail Gutierrez,&nbsp;Madeline Horan,&nbsp;Christine A Limbers","doi":"10.1177/13591045231157141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Sibling Perception Questionnaire (SPQ) in children with a sibling with a chronic illness. Full-text journal articles were located in APA PsycInfo and PubMed databases and by searching the reference lists of studies. Studies included reported on the psychometric properties of at least one domain of the SPQ in children under 18 years who had a sibling with a chronic health condition. Twenty-three studies met inclusion criteria. The quality of the evidence was assessed with the COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist. None of the included studies reported on all 10 properties recommended by COSMIN and there was extensive variability in the quality of methods used to assess the psychometric properties of the SPQ across studies. The negative adjustment scale demonstrated the strongest internal consistency reliability across the studies included in the review. Eight studies assessed convergent validity, with all but one demonstrating the SPQ total score to be adequately correlated with like constructs. The studies included in the review provided preliminary support for the responsive of the SPQ in detecting clinically significant changes due to an intervention. Taken as a whole, findings from this review provide preliminary evidence for the SPQ as a reliable, valid, and responsive measure in children who have a chronically ill sibling. Future studies with stronger methodological quality and that assess test re-test reliability, known groups validity, and the factor structure of the SPQ are needed. This work did not receive any funding and the authors have no competing interests to declare.</p>","PeriodicalId":48840,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry","volume":"28 3","pages":"1192-1216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045231157141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Sibling Perception Questionnaire (SPQ) in children with a sibling with a chronic illness. Full-text journal articles were located in APA PsycInfo and PubMed databases and by searching the reference lists of studies. Studies included reported on the psychometric properties of at least one domain of the SPQ in children under 18 years who had a sibling with a chronic health condition. Twenty-three studies met inclusion criteria. The quality of the evidence was assessed with the COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist. None of the included studies reported on all 10 properties recommended by COSMIN and there was extensive variability in the quality of methods used to assess the psychometric properties of the SPQ across studies. The negative adjustment scale demonstrated the strongest internal consistency reliability across the studies included in the review. Eight studies assessed convergent validity, with all but one demonstrating the SPQ total score to be adequately correlated with like constructs. The studies included in the review provided preliminary support for the responsive of the SPQ in detecting clinically significant changes due to an intervention. Taken as a whole, findings from this review provide preliminary evidence for the SPQ as a reliable, valid, and responsive measure in children who have a chronically ill sibling. Future studies with stronger methodological quality and that assess test re-test reliability, known groups validity, and the factor structure of the SPQ are needed. This work did not receive any funding and the authors have no competing interests to declare.

兄弟姐妹知觉问卷心理测量特性的系统回顾。
本研究的目的是对兄弟姐妹知觉问卷(SPQ)在兄弟姐妹患有慢性疾病的儿童中的心理测量特性进行系统回顾。全文期刊文章在APA PsycInfo和PubMed数据库中找到,并通过搜索研究的参考文献列表找到。研究包括对有慢性疾病兄弟姐妹的18岁以下儿童SPQ至少一个领域的心理测量特性的报道。23项研究符合纳入标准。使用COSMIN偏倚风险检查表评估证据的质量。没有一项纳入的研究报告了COSMIN推荐的所有10个属性,并且在评估SPQ心理测量属性的方法质量上存在广泛的差异。负向调整量表在本研究中表现出最强的内部一致性信度。八项研究评估了收敛效度,除了一项研究外,其他研究都证明了SPQ总分与类似结构充分相关。本综述中纳入的研究为SPQ在检测干预引起的临床显著变化方面的反应性提供了初步支持。总的来说,本综述的发现为SPQ作为一种可靠、有效和反应灵敏的测量方法在有慢性病兄弟姐妹的儿童中提供了初步证据。未来的研究需要更强的方法学质量,评估测试重测信度、已知组效度和SPQ的因素结构。这项工作没有获得任何资助,作者没有任何竞争利益需要申报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
130
期刊介绍: Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry brings together clinically oriented, peer reviewed work of the highest distinction from an international and multidisciplinary perspective, offering comprehensive coverage of clinical and treatment issues across the range of treatment modalities. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry is interested in advancing theory, practice and clinical research in the realm of child and adolescent psychology and psychiatry and related disciplines. The journal directs its attention to matters of clinical practice, including related topics such as the ethics of treatment and the integration of research into practice. Multidisciplinary in approach, the journal includes work by, and is of interest to, child psychologists, psychiatrists and psychotherapists, nurses, social workers and all other professionals in the fields of child and adolescent psychology and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信