The impact of ADHD symptom severity on reinforcement and punishment learning among adults.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Stephanie S J Morris, Joseph S Raiker, Aaron T Mattfeld, Whitney D Fosco
{"title":"The impact of ADHD symptom severity on reinforcement and punishment learning among adults.","authors":"Stephanie S J Morris,&nbsp;Joseph S Raiker,&nbsp;Aaron T Mattfeld,&nbsp;Whitney D Fosco","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2023.2178398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Aberrations in feedback learning are hypothesised to contribute to the behavioural disruptions and impairment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, few studies have evaluated the relation of reward/punishment feedback and ADHD symptom severity on learning. The current study evaluates the differential effects of reward and punishment feedback on learning among adults with elevated ADHD. <b>Methods:</b> One hundred five participants self-reported their level of current ADHD symptoms and completed an innovative instrumental learning task. <b>Results:</b> Consistent with predictions, participants with low self-reported ADHD symptom severity benefitted equally from reward and punishment feedback during the learning task, whereas participants with high self-reported symptom severity performed better (indexed by accuracy on learning task) from reward than punishment feedback trials. <b>Conclusions:</b> Overall, adults with high self-reported symptom severity of ADHD learned more from reward-based feedback, which provides critical implications for motivational theories about ADHD, as well as for treatment protocols. Future work should examine the translatability of results within a treatment setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":51277,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","volume":"28 2","pages":"147-161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2023.2178398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Aberrations in feedback learning are hypothesised to contribute to the behavioural disruptions and impairment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, few studies have evaluated the relation of reward/punishment feedback and ADHD symptom severity on learning. The current study evaluates the differential effects of reward and punishment feedback on learning among adults with elevated ADHD. Methods: One hundred five participants self-reported their level of current ADHD symptoms and completed an innovative instrumental learning task. Results: Consistent with predictions, participants with low self-reported ADHD symptom severity benefitted equally from reward and punishment feedback during the learning task, whereas participants with high self-reported symptom severity performed better (indexed by accuracy on learning task) from reward than punishment feedback trials. Conclusions: Overall, adults with high self-reported symptom severity of ADHD learned more from reward-based feedback, which provides critical implications for motivational theories about ADHD, as well as for treatment protocols. Future work should examine the translatability of results within a treatment setting.

ADHD症状严重程度对成人强化和惩罚学习的影响。
导读:反馈学习中的畸变被假设为导致注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的行为中断和损害。然而,很少有研究评估奖惩反馈与ADHD症状严重程度在学习上的关系。目前的研究评估了奖励和惩罚反馈对多动症成人学习的不同影响。方法:105名参与者自我报告了他们目前的ADHD症状水平,并完成了一项创新的工具学习任务。结果:与预测一致,自我报告ADHD症状严重程度低的参与者在学习任务中从奖惩反馈中受益相同,而自我报告症状严重程度高的参与者在奖励反馈试验中的表现(以学习任务的准确性为指标)优于惩罚反馈试验。结论:总体而言,自我报告的ADHD症状严重程度高的成年人从基于奖励的反馈中学到了更多,这为ADHD的动机理论以及治疗方案提供了重要的启示。未来的工作应该检查结果在治疗环境中的可翻译性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (CNP) publishes high quality empirical and theoretical papers in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive neuropsychiatry. Specifically the journal promotes the study of cognitive processes underlying psychological and behavioural abnormalities, including psychotic symptoms, with and without organic brain disease. Since 1996, CNP has published original papers, short reports, case studies and theoretical and empirical reviews in fields of clinical and cognitive neuropsychiatry, which have a bearing on the understanding of normal cognitive processes. Relevant research from cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuropsychology and clinical populations will also be considered. There are no page charges and we are able to offer free color printing where color is necessary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信