A systematic review on the impact of alcohol warning labels.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Journal of Addictive Diseases Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-22 DOI:10.1080/10550887.2023.2210020
Kayla M Joyce, Myles Davidson, Eden Manly, Sherry H Stewart, Mohammed Al-Hamdani
{"title":"A systematic review on the impact of alcohol warning labels.","authors":"Kayla M Joyce, Myles Davidson, Eden Manly, Sherry H Stewart, Mohammed Al-Hamdani","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2023.2210020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Findings on the effects of alcohol warning labels (AWLs) as a harm reduction tool have been mixed. This systematic review synthesized extant literature on the impact of AWLs on proxies of alcohol use. PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMED, and MEDLINE databases and reference lists of eligible articles. Following PRISMA guidelines, 1,589 articles published prior to July 2020 were retrieved <i>via</i> database and 45 were <i>via</i> reference lists (961 following duplicate removal). Article titles and abstracts were screened, leaving the full text of 96 for review. The full-text review identified 77 articles meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria which are included here. Risk of bias among included studies was examined using the Evidence Project risk of bias tool. Findings fell into five categories of alcohol use proxies including knowledge/awareness, perceptions, attention, recall/recognition, attitudes/beliefs, and intentions/behavior. Real-world studies highlighted an increase in AWL awareness, alcohol-related risk perceptions (limited findings), and AWL recall/recognition post-AWL implementation; these findings have decreased over time. Conversely, findings from experimental studies were mixed. AWL content/formatting and participant sociodemographic factors also appear to influence the effectiveness of AWLs. Findings suggest conclusions differ based on the study methodology used, favoring real-world versus experimental studies. Future research should consider AWL content/formatting and participant sociodemographic factors as moderators. AWLs appear to be a promising approach for supporting more informed alcohol consumption and should be considered as one component in a comprehensive alcohol control strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"170-193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2023.2210020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Findings on the effects of alcohol warning labels (AWLs) as a harm reduction tool have been mixed. This systematic review synthesized extant literature on the impact of AWLs on proxies of alcohol use. PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMED, and MEDLINE databases and reference lists of eligible articles. Following PRISMA guidelines, 1,589 articles published prior to July 2020 were retrieved via database and 45 were via reference lists (961 following duplicate removal). Article titles and abstracts were screened, leaving the full text of 96 for review. The full-text review identified 77 articles meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria which are included here. Risk of bias among included studies was examined using the Evidence Project risk of bias tool. Findings fell into five categories of alcohol use proxies including knowledge/awareness, perceptions, attention, recall/recognition, attitudes/beliefs, and intentions/behavior. Real-world studies highlighted an increase in AWL awareness, alcohol-related risk perceptions (limited findings), and AWL recall/recognition post-AWL implementation; these findings have decreased over time. Conversely, findings from experimental studies were mixed. AWL content/formatting and participant sociodemographic factors also appear to influence the effectiveness of AWLs. Findings suggest conclusions differ based on the study methodology used, favoring real-world versus experimental studies. Future research should consider AWL content/formatting and participant sociodemographic factors as moderators. AWLs appear to be a promising approach for supporting more informed alcohol consumption and should be considered as one component in a comprehensive alcohol control strategy.

关于酒精警告标签影响的系统回顾。
关于酒精警示标签(AWL)作为一种减低危害工具的效果,研究结果不一。本系统性综述综合了有关酒精警示标签对酒精使用替代品影响的现有文献。本综述参考了 PsycINFO、Web of Science、PubMED 和 MEDLINE 数据库以及符合条件文章的参考文献列表。根据 PRISMA 指南,通过数据库检索到了 1,589 篇 2020 年 7 月之前发表的文章,通过参考文献列表检索到了 45 篇(删除重复文章后为 961 篇)。对文章的标题和摘要进行了筛选,剩下 96 篇文章的全文供审阅。全文审查确定了 77 篇符合纳入/排除标准的文章,现将其纳入本文。使用证据项目偏倚风险工具对纳入研究的偏倚风险进行了检查。研究结果分为五类酒精使用代用指标,包括知识/意识、感知、注意力、回忆/认知、态度/信念和意图/行为。现实世界的研究突出表明,在实施《世界酒精清单》后,人们对《世界酒精清单》的认识、与酒精相关的风险认知(有限的研究结果)以及《世界酒精清单》的回忆/认知都有所提高;随着时间的推移,这些研究结果有所下降。相反,实验研究的结果则好坏参半。预警内容/格式和参与者的社会人口因素似乎也会影响预警的效果。研究结果表明,所使用的研究方法不同,得出的结论也不尽相同,真实世界研究与实验研究的结论也不尽相同。未来的研究应将 AWL 的内容/格式和参与者的社会人口因素视为调节因素。酒精预警似乎是支持更知情饮酒的一种有前途的方法,应被视为全面酒精控制策略的一个组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Addictive Diseases is an essential, comprehensive resource covering the full range of addictions for today"s addiction professional. This in-depth, practical journal helps you stay on top of the vital issues and the clinical skills necessary to ensure effective practice. The latest research, treatments, and public policy issues in addiction medicine are presented in a fully integrated, multi-specialty perspective. Top researchers and respected leaders in addiction issues share their knowledge and insights to keep you up-to-date on the most important research and practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信