Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Munich Wrist Questionnaire in Patients With Wrist Problems.

IF 2.2 3区医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-20 DOI:10.1177/01632787231172276

Mehmet Yetiş, İsmail Ceylan, Mehmet Canlı, Ömer Alperen Gürses, Mensure Aslan, Levent Horoz, Abdulhamit Tayfur

{"title":"Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Munich Wrist Questionnaire in Patients With Wrist Problems.","authors":"Mehmet Yetiş, İsmail Ceylan, Mehmet Canlı, Ömer Alperen Gürses, Mensure Aslan, Levent Horoz, Abdulhamit Tayfur","doi":"10.1177/01632787231172276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence for the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Munich Wrist Questionnaire (MWQ), a patient reported outcome measurement tool (PROM) was evaluated. A total of 80 patients (54.1 ± 1.4 years, 68 females) with wrist problems were recruited. The MWQ was translated into Turkish (MWQ-TR). Criterion validity with Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) was tested by using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Intraclass correlations coefficient (ICC) was used to analyze the test-retest reliability. There was a moderate correlation (r = -0.49, p < 0.001) between MWQ-TR and DASH, while correlations were strong between MWQ-TR and PRWE (r = 0.69, p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability of MWQ-TR was moderate (ICC = 0.67, 95% CI 0.26-0.84). The MWQ-Turkish version demonstrated evidence for its validity and reliability to evaluate pain, work/daily life activities and function in people with wrist problems in a Turkish population.","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"105-110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787231172276","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence for the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Munich Wrist Questionnaire (MWQ), a patient reported outcome measurement tool (PROM) was evaluated. A total of 80 patients (54.1 ± 1.4 years, 68 females) with wrist problems were recruited. The MWQ was translated into Turkish (MWQ-TR). Criterion validity with Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) was tested by using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Intraclass correlations coefficient (ICC) was used to analyze the test-retest reliability. There was a moderate correlation (r = -0.49, p < 0.001) between MWQ-TR and DASH, while correlations were strong between MWQ-TR and PRWE (r = 0.69, p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability of MWQ-TR was moderate (ICC = 0.67, 95% CI 0.26-0.84). The MWQ-Turkish version demonstrated evidence for its validity and reliability to evaluate pain, work/daily life activities and function in people with wrist problems in a Turkish population.

查看原文本刊更多论文

土耳其版慕尼黑腕关节问卷在腕关节问题患者中的有效性和可靠性

本研究评估了患者报告结果测量工具（PROM）--慕尼黑腕关节问卷（MWQ）土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。共招募了 80 名腕部疾病患者（54.1 ± 1.4 岁，68 名女性）。MWQ 被翻译成土耳其语（MWQ-TR）。使用皮尔逊相关系数测试了患者评定腕部评估（PRWE）和手臂、肩部和手部残疾（DASH）的标准有效性。类内相关系数（ICC）用于分析测试-再测可靠性。MWQ-TR 与 DASH 之间存在中度相关性（r = -0.49，p < 0.001），而 MWQ-TR 与 PRWE 之间存在较强相关性（r = 0.69，p < 0.001）。MWQ-TR 的重测可靠性为中等（ICC = 0.67，95% CI 0.26-0.84）。土耳其版 MWQ 证明了其在评估土耳其腕部疾病患者的疼痛、工作/日常生活活动和功能方面的有效性和可靠性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Evaluation & the Health Professions 医学-卫生保健

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Evaluation & the Health Professions is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that provides health-related professionals with state-of-the-art methodological, measurement, and statistical tools for conceptualizing the etiology of health promotion and problems, and developing, implementing, and evaluating health programs, teaching and training services, and products that pertain to a myriad of health dimensions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 31 days