Within-Person Bidirectional Associations Over Time Between Parenting and Youths' Callousness.

IF 4.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Meagan Docherty, Paul Boxer, L Rowell Huesmann, Brad J Bushman, Craig A Anderson, Douglas A Gentile, Eric F Dubow
{"title":"Within-Person Bidirectional Associations Over Time Between Parenting and Youths' Callousness.","authors":"Meagan Docherty, Paul Boxer, L Rowell Huesmann, Brad J Bushman, Craig A Anderson, Douglas A Gentile, Eric F Dubow","doi":"10.1080/15374416.2023.2188554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Callousness has been identified as a key driver of aggressive and violent behavior from childhood into early adulthood. Although previous research has underscored the importance of the parenting environment in contributing to the development of youth callousness, findings have generally been confined to the between-individual level and have not examined bidirectionality. In the current study, we test whether aspects of parenting are associated with callousness from childhood to adolescence both between and within individuals, examine the temporal ordering of associations, and test whether these relations are moderated by gender or developmental stage.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data came from a longitudinal study in which parents of 1,421 youth (52% girls; 62% White and 22% Black) from the second, fourth, and ninth grades were interviewed three times, with one year between consecutive interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A random-intercept cross-lagged panel model indicated that elevated youth callousness predicts subsequent increases in parental rejection and decreases in consistency of discipline. Findings were largely similar for boys and girls, but within-individual associations were generally stronger for 4<sup>th</sup> graders compared to the 2<sup>nd</sup> and 9<sup>th</sup> graders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Callousness and parenting practices and attitudes were related both at the between-individual and within-individual level. These results have implications for the etiology and treatment of children and adolescents who exhibit callousness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"607-622"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2023.2188554","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Callousness has been identified as a key driver of aggressive and violent behavior from childhood into early adulthood. Although previous research has underscored the importance of the parenting environment in contributing to the development of youth callousness, findings have generally been confined to the between-individual level and have not examined bidirectionality. In the current study, we test whether aspects of parenting are associated with callousness from childhood to adolescence both between and within individuals, examine the temporal ordering of associations, and test whether these relations are moderated by gender or developmental stage.

Method: Data came from a longitudinal study in which parents of 1,421 youth (52% girls; 62% White and 22% Black) from the second, fourth, and ninth grades were interviewed three times, with one year between consecutive interviews.

Results: A random-intercept cross-lagged panel model indicated that elevated youth callousness predicts subsequent increases in parental rejection and decreases in consistency of discipline. Findings were largely similar for boys and girls, but within-individual associations were generally stronger for 4th graders compared to the 2nd and 9th graders.

Conclusions: Callousness and parenting practices and attitudes were related both at the between-individual and within-individual level. These results have implications for the etiology and treatment of children and adolescents who exhibit callousness.

随着时间的推移,养育子女和年轻人的关爱之间的人内双向关联。
目的:从童年到成年早期,好动性已被确定为攻击性和暴力行为的关键驱动因素。尽管之前的研究强调了养育环境在促进青少年冷酷无情发展方面的重要性,但研究结果通常仅限于个体之间的水平,没有考察双向性。在目前的研究中,我们测试了从童年到青春期,在个体之间和个体内部,养育子女的各个方面是否与冷酷无情有关,检查了关联的时间顺序,并测试了这些关系是否受性别或发展阶段的调节。方法:数据来自一项纵向研究,该研究对1421名二年级、四年级和九年级的青少年(52%为女孩,62%为白人,22%为黑人)的父母进行了三次采访,连续采访间隔一年。结果:一个随机截距交叉滞后面板模型表明,青少年冷酷无情的加剧预示着父母拒绝的增加和纪律一致性的降低。男孩和女孩的研究结果基本相似,但与二年级和九年级学生相比,四年级学生的个体联想普遍更强。结论:在个体之间和个体内部层面上,谨慎性与父母的做法和态度都有关系。这些结果对表现出冷酷无情的儿童和青少年的病因和治疗具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (JCCAP) is the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association. It publishes original contributions on the following topics: (a) the development and evaluation of assessment and intervention techniques for use with clinical child and adolescent populations; (b) the development and maintenance of clinical child and adolescent problems; (c) cross-cultural and sociodemographic issues that have a clear bearing on clinical child and adolescent psychology in terms of theory, research, or practice; and (d) training and professional practice in clinical child and adolescent psychology, as well as child advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信