Validation of a novel nutrition risk screening tool in stroke patients.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Ying Xie, Qian Liu, Hongmei Xue, Yujia Wei, Jing Wang, Zengning Li
{"title":"Validation of a novel nutrition risk screening tool in stroke patients.","authors":"Ying Xie,&nbsp;Qian Liu,&nbsp;Hongmei Xue,&nbsp;Yujia Wei,&nbsp;Jing Wang,&nbsp;Zengning Li","doi":"10.6133/apjcn.202303_32(1).0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>We aimed to apply a novel nutrition screening tool to stroke patients and assess its reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods and study design: </strong>Cross-sectional data among 214 imaging-confirmed stroke patients were collected between 2015 and 2017 in two public hospitals in Hebei, China. Delphi consultation was conducted to evaluate the items in the NRS-S scale. Anthropometric indices including body mass index (BMI), triceps skin fold thickness (TSF), upper arm circumference (AMC) and mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC) were measured. Internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity and content validity were assessed. In order to estimate content validity, two rounds Delphi consultation of fifteen experts were conducted to evaluate the items in the Nutrition Risk Screening Scale for Stroke (NRS-S).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High internal consistency was indicated by Cronbach's alpha of 0.632 and a split-half reliability of 0.629; test-retest reliability of NRS-S items ranged from 0.728 to 1.000 (p<0.0001), except for loss of appetite (0.436, p<0.001) and gastrointestinal symptoms (0.213, p=0.042). Content validity index of 0.89 indicated robust validity of the items. Regarding construct validity, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was 0.579, and the result of the Bartlett test of sphericity was 166.790 (p<0.001). Three factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, which contributed to 63.079% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the questionnaire, finding the p-value of the model to be 0.321, indicating a high model fitting index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A novel stroke-specific nutritional risk screening tool demonstrated a relatively high reliability and validity in its clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":8486,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202303_32(1).0004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: We aimed to apply a novel nutrition screening tool to stroke patients and assess its reliability and validity.

Methods and study design: Cross-sectional data among 214 imaging-confirmed stroke patients were collected between 2015 and 2017 in two public hospitals in Hebei, China. Delphi consultation was conducted to evaluate the items in the NRS-S scale. Anthropometric indices including body mass index (BMI), triceps skin fold thickness (TSF), upper arm circumference (AMC) and mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC) were measured. Internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity and content validity were assessed. In order to estimate content validity, two rounds Delphi consultation of fifteen experts were conducted to evaluate the items in the Nutrition Risk Screening Scale for Stroke (NRS-S).

Results: High internal consistency was indicated by Cronbach's alpha of 0.632 and a split-half reliability of 0.629; test-retest reliability of NRS-S items ranged from 0.728 to 1.000 (p<0.0001), except for loss of appetite (0.436, p<0.001) and gastrointestinal symptoms (0.213, p=0.042). Content validity index of 0.89 indicated robust validity of the items. Regarding construct validity, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was 0.579, and the result of the Bartlett test of sphericity was 166.790 (p<0.001). Three factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, which contributed to 63.079% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the questionnaire, finding the p-value of the model to be 0.321, indicating a high model fitting index.

Conclusions: A novel stroke-specific nutritional risk screening tool demonstrated a relatively high reliability and validity in its clinical application.

卒中患者新型营养风险筛查工具的验证。
背景与目的:我们的目的是应用一种新的营养筛查工具对脑卒中患者进行筛查,并评估其信度和效度。方法与研究设计:收集2015 - 2017年河北省两所公立医院214例脑卒中影像学确诊患者的横断面数据。采用德尔菲咨询法对NRS-S量表中的项目进行评估。测量身体质量指数(BMI)、肱三头肌皮褶厚度(TSF)、上臂围度(AMC)、上臂肌围度(MAMC)等人体测量指标。评估了内部一致性信度、重测信度、结构效度和内容效度。为了评估内容效度,我们对《脑卒中营养风险筛查量表》(NRS-S)中的项目进行了两轮德尔菲咨询,共有15位专家参与评估。结果:Cronbach's alpha为0.632,劈半信度为0.629,表明内部一致性高;NRS-S项目的重测信度范围为0.728 ~ 1.000。结论:一种新的卒中特异性营养风险筛查工具在临床应用中具有较高的信度和效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aims of the Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition (APJCN) are to publish high quality clinical nutrition relevant research findings which can build the capacity of clinical nutritionists in the region and enhance the practice of human nutrition and related disciplines for health promotion and disease prevention. APJCN will publish original research reports, reviews, short communications and case reports. News, book reviews and other items will also be included. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer-reviewed by at least two anonymous reviewers and the Editor. The Editorial Board reserves the right to refuse any material for publication and advises that authors should retain copies of submitted manuscripts and correspondence as material cannot be returned. Final acceptance or rejection rests with the Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信