{"title":"Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form as screening tool for osteoporosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.","authors":"Yukio Fujita, Masanori Yoshikawa, Motoo Yamauchi, Yoshifumi Yamamoto, Takao Osa, Kazuhiro Sakaguchi, Nabuhiro Fujioka, Takahiro Ibaraki, Shigeo Muro","doi":"10.6133/apjcn.202303_32(1).0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Osteoporosis is a common complication of chronic obstructive pulmonary dis-ease (COPD). It is impractical to measure bone mineral density (BMD) in all patients with COPD. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form (MNA-SF), a simple nutritional status questionnaire, and osteoporosis, and to determine whether it can be used as a reliable screening tool for osteoporosis in patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods and study design: </strong>Thirty-seven patients with stable COPD were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Patients with MNA-SF scores >11 were defined as well-nourished, and those with scores of ≤11 being at risk for malnutrition. Body composition, BMD, and undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC), a bone metabolism marker, were measured using bioelectrical impedance, dual energy X-ray, and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen (45.9%) were classified as at risk for malnutrition, and 13 (35.1%) had osteoporosis. Patients at risk for malnutrition had significantly more osteoporosis and higher ucOC values than well-nourished patients (p=0.007, p=0.030, respectively). Patients with osteoporosis also had significantly lower body mass index (BMI) and fat-free mass index than those without osteoporosis (p= 0.007 and p=0.005, respectively), although FEV1 % pred was not significantly different. MNA-SF (cutoff value; 11) had better sensitivity to identify the presence of osteoporosis than BMI (cutoff value; 18.5 kg/m2) (sensitivity, 0.769; specificity, 0.708; sensitivity, 0.462; specificity, 0.875, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MNA-SF was associated with osteoporosis and bone metabolism markers in patients with COPD. MNA-SF may be a useful screening tool for osteoporo-sis in patients with COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8486,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202303_32(1).0003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Osteoporosis is a common complication of chronic obstructive pulmonary dis-ease (COPD). It is impractical to measure bone mineral density (BMD) in all patients with COPD. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form (MNA-SF), a simple nutritional status questionnaire, and osteoporosis, and to determine whether it can be used as a reliable screening tool for osteoporosis in patients with COPD.
Methods and study design: Thirty-seven patients with stable COPD were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Patients with MNA-SF scores >11 were defined as well-nourished, and those with scores of ≤11 being at risk for malnutrition. Body composition, BMD, and undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC), a bone metabolism marker, were measured using bioelectrical impedance, dual energy X-ray, and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, respectively.
Results: Seventeen (45.9%) were classified as at risk for malnutrition, and 13 (35.1%) had osteoporosis. Patients at risk for malnutrition had significantly more osteoporosis and higher ucOC values than well-nourished patients (p=0.007, p=0.030, respectively). Patients with osteoporosis also had significantly lower body mass index (BMI) and fat-free mass index than those without osteoporosis (p= 0.007 and p=0.005, respectively), although FEV1 % pred was not significantly different. MNA-SF (cutoff value; 11) had better sensitivity to identify the presence of osteoporosis than BMI (cutoff value; 18.5 kg/m2) (sensitivity, 0.769; specificity, 0.708; sensitivity, 0.462; specificity, 0.875, respectively).
Conclusions: MNA-SF was associated with osteoporosis and bone metabolism markers in patients with COPD. MNA-SF may be a useful screening tool for osteoporo-sis in patients with COPD.
背景与目的:骨质疏松症是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的常见并发症。测量所有COPD患者的骨密度(BMD)是不切实际的。本研究旨在探讨一种简单的营养状况问卷——Mini nutrition Assessment short form (MNA-SF)与骨质疏松症的关系,并确定其是否可作为COPD患者骨质疏松症的可靠筛查工具。方法和研究设计:37例稳定期COPD患者入组这项前瞻性队列研究。MNA-SF评分>11的患者被定义为营养良好,评分≤11的患者被定义为营养不良风险。分别使用生物电阻抗、双能x线和电化学发光免疫分析法测量体成分、骨密度和骨代谢标志物低羧化骨钙素(ucOC)。结果:营养不良危险17例(45.9%),骨质疏松13例(35.1%)。有营养不良风险的患者骨质疏松和ucOC值明显高于营养良好的患者(p=0.007, p=0.030)。骨质疏松症患者的身体质量指数(BMI)和无脂质量指数(fat-free mass index)均显著低于无骨质疏松症患者(p= 0.007和p=0.005),但FEV1 % pred差异无统计学意义。MNA-SF(截止值;11)对骨质疏松症的敏感性优于BMI(临界值;18.5 kg/m2)(灵敏度0.769;特异性,0.708;敏感性,0.462;特异性分别为0.875)。结论:MNA-SF与COPD患者骨质疏松和骨代谢标志物相关。MNA-SF可能是COPD患者骨质疏松症的有用筛查工具。
期刊介绍:
The aims of the Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition
(APJCN) are to publish high quality clinical nutrition relevant research findings which can build the capacity of
clinical nutritionists in the region and enhance the practice of human nutrition and related disciplines for health
promotion and disease prevention. APJCN will publish
original research reports, reviews, short communications
and case reports. News, book reviews and other items will
also be included. The acceptance criteria for all papers are
the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated,
manuscripts are peer-reviewed by at least two anonymous
reviewers and the Editor. The Editorial Board reserves the
right to refuse any material for publication and advises
that authors should retain copies of submitted manuscripts
and correspondence as material cannot be returned. Final
acceptance or rejection rests with the Editorial Board