Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Levetiracetam Versus Phenytoin for Treating the Acute Phase of Neonatal Seizures.

IF 0.8 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mahmoud Mohammadi, Maliheh Kadivar, Razieh Sangsari, Kayvan Mirnia, Maryam Saeedi, Pegah Adhami
{"title":"Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Levetiracetam Versus Phenytoin for Treating the Acute Phase of Neonatal Seizures.","authors":"Mahmoud Mohammadi,&nbsp;Maliheh Kadivar,&nbsp;Razieh Sangsari,&nbsp;Kayvan Mirnia,&nbsp;Maryam Saeedi,&nbsp;Pegah Adhami","doi":"10.22037/ijcn.v17i1.36008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Neonatal seizure is a significant problem in this life course, and its timely and effective treatment is crucial. In this study, we compared the efficacy of levetiracetam versus phenytoin for treating the acute phase of neonatal seizures.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>In this single-blind case-control study, 60 consecutive children with neonatal seizures referred to the Children's medical center in Tehran, Iran, in 2018 were studied. Those neonates who had at least 30 minutes of seizure after Phenobarbital treatment were assigned to receive either phenytoin (20 mg/kg) or levetiracetam (initial dose of 40-60 mg/kg) through block randomization. The efficacy and safety of the two drugs were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 83.3% and 86.7% in phenytoin and Levetiracetam groups, respectively, which was not significantly different between groups (P=1.000). Adverse effects were nearly similar between groups (6.7% in the phenytoin group and 3.3% in the Levetiracetam group, P=1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Levetiracetam and phenytoin are both practical and safe for treating neonatal seizures.</p>","PeriodicalId":14537,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fc/63/ijcn-17-65.PMC9881830.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v17i1.36008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Neonatal seizure is a significant problem in this life course, and its timely and effective treatment is crucial. In this study, we compared the efficacy of levetiracetam versus phenytoin for treating the acute phase of neonatal seizures.

Materials & methods: In this single-blind case-control study, 60 consecutive children with neonatal seizures referred to the Children's medical center in Tehran, Iran, in 2018 were studied. Those neonates who had at least 30 minutes of seizure after Phenobarbital treatment were assigned to receive either phenytoin (20 mg/kg) or levetiracetam (initial dose of 40-60 mg/kg) through block randomization. The efficacy and safety of the two drugs were compared between the groups.

Results: The response rate was 83.3% and 86.7% in phenytoin and Levetiracetam groups, respectively, which was not significantly different between groups (P=1.000). Adverse effects were nearly similar between groups (6.7% in the phenytoin group and 3.3% in the Levetiracetam group, P=1.000).

Conclusion: Levetiracetam and phenytoin are both practical and safe for treating neonatal seizures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

左乙拉西坦与苯妥英治疗急性期新生儿癫痫发作的疗效和安全性比较。
目的:新生儿癫痫发作是其生命历程中的重要问题,及时有效的治疗至关重要。在这项研究中,我们比较了左乙拉西坦与苯妥英治疗急性期新生儿癫痫发作的疗效。材料与方法:在这项单盲病例对照研究中,研究对象是2018年伊朗德黑兰儿童医疗中心连续收治的60例新生儿癫痫发作患儿。苯巴比妥治疗后癫痫发作至少30分钟的新生儿通过块随机分组被分配接受苯妥英(20 mg/kg)或左乙拉西坦(初始剂量40-60 mg/kg)。比较两组药物的疗效和安全性。结果:苯妥英组有效率为83.3%,左乙拉西坦组有效率为86.7%,两组间差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。两组不良反应几乎相似(苯妥英组6.7%,左乙拉西坦组3.3%,P=1.000)。结论:左乙拉西坦与苯妥英治疗新生儿癫痫发作既实用又安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信