The association between work hours, shift work, and job latitude with fecundability: A preconception cohort study.

IF 5.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Craig James McKinnon, Elizabeth Elliott Hatch, Olivia R Orta, Kenneth J Rothman, Michael L Eisenberg, Johanna Wefes-Potter, Lauren A Wise
{"title":"The association between work hours, shift work, and job latitude with fecundability: A preconception cohort study.","authors":"Craig James McKinnon,&nbsp;Elizabeth Elliott Hatch,&nbsp;Olivia R Orta,&nbsp;Kenneth J Rothman,&nbsp;Michael L Eisenberg,&nbsp;Johanna Wefes-Potter,&nbsp;Lauren A Wise","doi":"10.1037/ocp0000279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of occupational stress on male fertility is understudied. We examined associations between male occupational stress and fecundability. We used data from Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO), a North American preconception cohort study. At baseline (2013-2019), male participants aged ≥ 21 years completed a baseline questionnaire on employment status, hours worked per week, time of day worked (daytime, evening, nights, and changing or rotating shifts), and job title. We used the O*NET occupational database to rate independence by job title. Female partners were followed via bimonthly follow-up questionnaires for 12 months or until pregnancy. We restricted analyses to 1,818 couples attempting conception for ≤ 6 cycles at enrollment. We used proportional probabilities regression to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The FR comparing unemployed with employed men was0.84 (95% CI: 0.62-1.14). Among employed men, FRs and 95% CIs for evening shift work, night shift work, and rotating shift work were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.68-1.17), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.66-1.33), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.75-1.11) relative to daytime shift work. The FR for any nondaytime shift work was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.78-1.07). Total work hours (long or short) and job independence scores were not appreciably associated with fecundability. In conclusion, working nondaytime shifts and being unemployed were associated with slightly decreased fecundability. However, the variability in these estimates was substantial and the results were reasonably consistent with chance. Little association was observed for other occupation measures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799775/pdf/nihms-1729457.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000279","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The role of occupational stress on male fertility is understudied. We examined associations between male occupational stress and fecundability. We used data from Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO), a North American preconception cohort study. At baseline (2013-2019), male participants aged ≥ 21 years completed a baseline questionnaire on employment status, hours worked per week, time of day worked (daytime, evening, nights, and changing or rotating shifts), and job title. We used the O*NET occupational database to rate independence by job title. Female partners were followed via bimonthly follow-up questionnaires for 12 months or until pregnancy. We restricted analyses to 1,818 couples attempting conception for ≤ 6 cycles at enrollment. We used proportional probabilities regression to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The FR comparing unemployed with employed men was0.84 (95% CI: 0.62-1.14). Among employed men, FRs and 95% CIs for evening shift work, night shift work, and rotating shift work were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.68-1.17), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.66-1.33), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.75-1.11) relative to daytime shift work. The FR for any nondaytime shift work was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.78-1.07). Total work hours (long or short) and job independence scores were not appreciably associated with fecundability. In conclusion, working nondaytime shifts and being unemployed were associated with slightly decreased fecundability. However, the variability in these estimates was substantial and the results were reasonably consistent with chance. Little association was observed for other occupation measures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

工作时间、轮班工作和工作纬度与生育能力之间的关系:一项孕前队列研究。
职业压力对男性生育能力的影响尚未得到充分研究。我们研究了男性职业压力与生育能力之间的关系。我们使用了来自妊娠研究在线(PRESTO)的数据,这是一项北美孕前队列研究。在基线(2013-2019年),年龄≥21岁的男性参与者完成了一份关于就业状况、每周工作时间、一天工作时间(白天、晚上、晚上、轮班或轮岗)和职位的基线问卷。我们使用了O*NET职业数据库来根据职位来评估独立性。对女性伴侣进行为期12个月或直到怀孕的两个月的跟踪调查问卷。我们将分析限制在1818对在入组时尝试怀孕≤6个周期的夫妇。我们使用比例概率回归来估计可育率(FRs)和95%置信区间(ci)。失业与就业男性的FR比较为0.84 (95% CI: 0.62-1.14)。在受雇男性中,夜班工作、夜班工作和轮班工作的FRs和95% CI相对于白班工作分别为0.89 (95% CI: 0.68-1.17)、0.94 (95% CI: 0.66-1.33)和0.91 (95% CI: 0.75-1.11)。任何非日间轮班工作的FR为0.91 (95% CI: 0.78-1.07)。总工作时间(长或短)和工作独立性得分与生育能力没有明显的联系。总之,非白班工作和失业与生育能力略有下降有关。然而,这些估计的可变性很大,结果与偶然性相当一致。其他职业指标的相关性不大。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Occupational Health Psychology offers research, theory, and public policy articles in occupational health psychology, an interdisciplinary field representing a broad range of backgrounds, interests, and specializations. Occupational health psychology concerns the application of psychology to improving the quality of work life and to protecting and promoting the safety, health, and well-being of workers. This journal focuses on the work environment, the individual, and the work-family interface.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信