Caregiver Perspectives on the Benefits, Burdens, and Moral Distress of Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Cynthia P Paidipati, Anessa M Foxwell, Kim Mooney-Doyle, Deborah Tiller, Jennifer Pinto-Martin, Connie M Ulrich
{"title":"Caregiver Perspectives on the Benefits, Burdens, and Moral Distress of Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials.","authors":"Cynthia P Paidipati,&nbsp;Anessa M Foxwell,&nbsp;Kim Mooney-Doyle,&nbsp;Deborah Tiller,&nbsp;Jennifer Pinto-Martin,&nbsp;Connie M Ulrich","doi":"10.1177/10748407221098187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Caregivers often face critical decisions, burdens, and perceived benefits related to a loved one participating in cancer clinical trial (CCTs). The purpose of this analysis was to better understand caregivers' perceptions on the benefits and burdens of participation in cancer clinical trials. Using a qualitative descriptive design, interviews with 20 caregivers of patient-participants from a larger parent study were conducted. Three major themes emerged. The benefits of research participation focused on enhancing the potential for saving a loved one's life, improving quality of life, and holding altruistic intentions. The burden of research participation emphasized a loved one's suffering as well as physical, emotional, logistical, and financial burden to caregivers. Caregiver moral distress highlighted distressing ethical encounters, such as making decisions on research participation and navigating suboptimal care. Understanding caregiver perceptions is an important step in designing future CCTs that minimize burdens and maximize patient and caregiver health and family-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10748407221098187","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Caregivers often face critical decisions, burdens, and perceived benefits related to a loved one participating in cancer clinical trial (CCTs). The purpose of this analysis was to better understand caregivers' perceptions on the benefits and burdens of participation in cancer clinical trials. Using a qualitative descriptive design, interviews with 20 caregivers of patient-participants from a larger parent study were conducted. Three major themes emerged. The benefits of research participation focused on enhancing the potential for saving a loved one's life, improving quality of life, and holding altruistic intentions. The burden of research participation emphasized a loved one's suffering as well as physical, emotional, logistical, and financial burden to caregivers. Caregiver moral distress highlighted distressing ethical encounters, such as making decisions on research participation and navigating suboptimal care. Understanding caregiver perceptions is an important step in designing future CCTs that minimize burdens and maximize patient and caregiver health and family-centered care.

护理者对参与癌症临床试验的利益、负担和道德困境的看法。
护理人员经常面临与参与癌症临床试验(cct)的亲人相关的关键决策、负担和感知利益。本分析的目的是为了更好地了解护理人员对参与癌症临床试验的好处和负担的看法。采用定性描述设计,采访了20名来自大型家长研究的患者参与者的护理人员。出现了三个主要主题。参与研究的好处集中在提高挽救亲人生命的潜力、提高生活质量和保持利他主义的意图。参与研究的负担强调了亲人的痛苦以及照顾者的身体、情感、后勤和经济负担。照顾者的道德困境强调了令人痛苦的伦理遭遇,例如在研究参与方面做出决定和导航次优护理。了解照顾者的看法是设计未来有条件现金转移治疗的重要一步,以最大限度地减少负担,最大限度地提高患者和照顾者的健康和以家庭为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Nursing (JFN) is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal of nursing research, practice, education, and policy issues, as well as empirical and theoretical analyses on the subject of family health. Its interdisciplinary, international, and collaborative perspectives examine cultural diversity and families across the life cycle. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信