Revisiting Black Americans' self-protective strategies: The effect of negative intelligence feedback on implicit (vs. explicit) self-esteem.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1037/cdp0000584
Luis M Rivera, Delisa Nicole Young
{"title":"Revisiting Black Americans' self-protective strategies: The effect of negative intelligence feedback on implicit (vs. explicit) self-esteem.","authors":"Luis M Rivera, Delisa Nicole Young","doi":"10.1037/cdp0000584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Black Americans use identity-based self-protective strategies to maintain their explicit self-esteem after a threat to their intelligence. This effect is consistent with the associative-propositional evaluation (APE) model, which suggests that self-protective strategies operate during a propositional process that results in no change in <i>explicit</i> self-esteem. However, the APE model also suggests that <i>implicit</i> self-esteem may be sensitive to an intelligence threat because it increases the accessibility of automatically activated evaluations about Black Americans, namely the stereotype that their group is unintelligent. These hypotheses are tested across two experiments.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Black American participants across both experiments (Experiment 1: <i>N</i> = 57; 40 females, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 21.60; Experiment 2: <i>N</i> = 79; 64 females, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 24.86) completed an intelligence test, then were randomly assigned to receive either negative feedback about their performance or no-feedback. Participants then completed measures of implicit and explicit self-esteem. Participants in Experiment 2 also completed a measure of subjective identity centrality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In support of the hypotheses, Black American participants across both experiments who received negative performance feedback on an intelligence test exhibited lower implicit self-esteem compared to those who did not receive feedback. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that this effect emerged only among strongly identified Black American participants. Finally, and consistent with past research, explicit self-esteem was unaffected by negative performance feedback among all participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research demonstrates the boundary conditions of Black Americans' adoption of identity-based self-protective strategies to protect their implicit versus explicit self-esteem following an intelligence threat. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48151,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000584","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Black Americans use identity-based self-protective strategies to maintain their explicit self-esteem after a threat to their intelligence. This effect is consistent with the associative-propositional evaluation (APE) model, which suggests that self-protective strategies operate during a propositional process that results in no change in explicit self-esteem. However, the APE model also suggests that implicit self-esteem may be sensitive to an intelligence threat because it increases the accessibility of automatically activated evaluations about Black Americans, namely the stereotype that their group is unintelligent. These hypotheses are tested across two experiments.

Method: Black American participants across both experiments (Experiment 1: N = 57; 40 females, Mage = 21.60; Experiment 2: N = 79; 64 females, Mage = 24.86) completed an intelligence test, then were randomly assigned to receive either negative feedback about their performance or no-feedback. Participants then completed measures of implicit and explicit self-esteem. Participants in Experiment 2 also completed a measure of subjective identity centrality.

Results: In support of the hypotheses, Black American participants across both experiments who received negative performance feedback on an intelligence test exhibited lower implicit self-esteem compared to those who did not receive feedback. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that this effect emerged only among strongly identified Black American participants. Finally, and consistent with past research, explicit self-esteem was unaffected by negative performance feedback among all participants.

Conclusions: This research demonstrates the boundary conditions of Black Americans' adoption of identity-based self-protective strategies to protect their implicit versus explicit self-esteem following an intelligence threat. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

重新审视美国黑人的自我保护策略:负智力反馈对内隐(与外显)自尊的影响。
目标:美国黑人在智力受到威胁后,使用基于身份的自我保护策略来保持他们明确的自尊。这种效应与联想命题评估(APE)模型一致,该模型表明,自我保护策略在命题过程中运作,不会导致外显自尊的变化。然而,APE模型也表明,内隐自尊可能对智力威胁敏感,因为它增加了对美国黑人的自动激活评估的可及性,即他们群体不聪明的刻板印象。这些假设在两个实验中得到了检验。方法:两个实验的美国黑人参与者(实验1:N=57;40名女性,Mage=21.60;实验2:N=79;64名女性,Mage=24.86)完成了一项智力测试,然后被随机分配接受关于他们表现的负面反馈或无反馈。然后,参与者完成了内隐自尊和外显自尊的测量。实验2中的参与者还完成了主观身份中心性的测量。结果:为了支持这些假设,在两个实验中,在智力测试中收到负面表现反馈的美国黑人参与者与没有收到反馈的参与者相比,表现出较低的内隐自尊。实验2进一步证明,这种影响只在身份认同强烈的美国黑人参与者中出现。最后,与过去的研究一致,所有参与者的外显自尊不受负面表现反馈的影响。结论:这项研究证明了美国黑人在智力威胁后采用基于身份的自我保护策略来保护其内隐自尊与外显自尊的边界条件。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology seeks to publish theoretical, conceptual, research, and case study articles that promote the development of knowledge and understanding, application of psychological principles, and scholarly analysis of social–political forces affecting racial and ethnic minorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信