Scholarship and Epistemology: A Response to Backman and Barker (2022)

IF 1.6 3区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Quest Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/00336297.2022.2158480

P. Ward, Shiri Ayvazo, Fatih Dervent, P. Iserbyt, Insook Kim

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this response, we address issues they raised in their paper. We tackle the misrepresentation of our research and findings by further clarifying the applied behavior analytic framework underpinning our intervention studies; emphasize the substantial effects of improving the content knowledge of teachers; refute ideological positioning based on scholarly one-upmanship; and elaborate on the scientific growth of our understanding of CCK.

查看原文本刊更多论文

学术与认识论:对巴克曼与巴克的回应(2022)

在这个回应中，我们解决了他们在论文中提出的问题。我们通过进一步澄清支持我们的干预研究的应用行为分析框架来解决对我们的研究和发现的歪曲;强调提高教师内容知识的实质性效果;驳斥基于学术优势的意识形态定位;并详细阐述了我们对CCK认识的科学增长。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Quest 社会科学-运动科学

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Quest is the official journal of the National Association for Kinesiology in Higher Education (NAKHE). It is the leading journal for interdisciplinary scholarship for professionals in kinesiology in higher education. Quest provides a public forum for scholarship, creative thought, and research relevant to a broad range of interests held by faculty and leaders in higher education today. Quest publishes: 1) manuscripts that address issues and concerns relevant and meaningful to the field of kinesiology; 2) original research reports that address empirical questions that are contextualized within higher education and hold significance to a broad range of faculty and administrators in kinesiology; and 3) reviews of literature and/or research of interest to one or more sub-disciplines in kinesiology. Quest does not publish papers focused on sport (e.g., amateur, collegiate, professional) that are contextualized outside of kinesiology in higher education.