Relating through instructing: affiliative interactional resources used by the teacher when giving feedback on student work

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Elena Shvidko
{"title":"Relating through instructing: affiliative interactional resources used by the teacher when giving feedback on student work","authors":"Elena Shvidko","doi":"10.1080/19463014.2020.1742174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Providing feedback on student work is a vital part of pedagogy. However, instructors may inadvertently create a distance between themselves and students by asserting authority when evaluating students’ work. This may conflict with maintaining a positive atmosphere in the classroom and developing interpersonal solidarity with students, which is crucial for teacher–student rapport. Therefore, it is important for teachers to know how to provide feedback in more affiliative, less threatening ways. Employing multimodal microanalysis of teacher–student interaction, this study demonstrates how one writing teacher used affiliative interactional resources–expressing empathy, being playful, and offering a compliment–in a way that was likely to minimise her imposition, reduce the authoritarian character of her feedback, and create affiliative moments with students while providing feedback on their work. Reflecting on the results of this analysis, the article offers pedagogical implications.","PeriodicalId":45350,"journal":{"name":"Classroom Discourse","volume":"16 1","pages":"233 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classroom Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2020.1742174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Providing feedback on student work is a vital part of pedagogy. However, instructors may inadvertently create a distance between themselves and students by asserting authority when evaluating students’ work. This may conflict with maintaining a positive atmosphere in the classroom and developing interpersonal solidarity with students, which is crucial for teacher–student rapport. Therefore, it is important for teachers to know how to provide feedback in more affiliative, less threatening ways. Employing multimodal microanalysis of teacher–student interaction, this study demonstrates how one writing teacher used affiliative interactional resources–expressing empathy, being playful, and offering a compliment–in a way that was likely to minimise her imposition, reduce the authoritarian character of her feedback, and create affiliative moments with students while providing feedback on their work. Reflecting on the results of this analysis, the article offers pedagogical implications.
通过指导建立联系:教师在对学生作业进行反馈时使用的附属互动资源
对学生作业提供反馈是教育学的重要组成部分。然而,在评价学生的作业时,教师可能会在不经意间建立自己和学生之间的距离。这可能与维持积极的课堂氛围和发展与学生的人际团结相冲突,而这对师生关系至关重要。因此,教师知道如何以更亲近、更少威胁的方式提供反馈是很重要的。通过对师生互动的多模态微观分析,本研究展示了一位写作老师如何使用附属互动资源——表达同理心、开玩笑和提供赞美——以一种可能最大限度地减少她的强加,减少她的反馈的专制特征,并在为学生提供工作反馈的同时创造与学生的附属时刻。通过对分析结果的反思,本文提出了教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Classroom Discourse
Classroom Discourse EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信