Intención de uso y autopercepción docente del bLearning en educación superior

IF 2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Judith Martín Lucas, Patricia Torrijos Fincias, S. González, Ángel García del Dujo
{"title":"Intención de uso y autopercepción docente del bLearning en educación superior","authors":"Judith Martín Lucas, Patricia Torrijos Fincias, S. González, Ángel García del Dujo","doi":"10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2021-391-475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years the training scenarios are undergoing major transformations, mostly caused by the arrival of information and communication technologies. One of these changes has been translated into the expression Blended Learning, a formative methodology that combines face-to-face and online teaching largely embraced by the education field. Although it is true that research in this model is very abundant, the study on the adoption and perception of Blended Learning by teachers seems to have been neglected. For this reason, a quantitative study is presented focused on researching university teacher’s perception regarding this formative modality. A total of 982 teachers from 35 Spanish public universities responded to the Questionnaire on Combined Formative Modality. The results show that, although a high percentage of teachers say that they know how this modality works and the advantages it reports, the percentage of teachers that acknowledge not having integrated it into the courses they teach is high. On the other hand, although the training offered by universities is considered important for its implementation, the intention of use is positively correlated with the teacher’s self-perception of the resources and knowledge at their disposal. In this sense, it is important to point out the need to recognize, by higher education institutions, both the training and the adaptive work of teachers in the implementation of the combined training strategy.","PeriodicalId":21314,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Educacion","volume":"63 1","pages":"209-235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Educacion","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2021-391-475","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In recent years the training scenarios are undergoing major transformations, mostly caused by the arrival of information and communication technologies. One of these changes has been translated into the expression Blended Learning, a formative methodology that combines face-to-face and online teaching largely embraced by the education field. Although it is true that research in this model is very abundant, the study on the adoption and perception of Blended Learning by teachers seems to have been neglected. For this reason, a quantitative study is presented focused on researching university teacher’s perception regarding this formative modality. A total of 982 teachers from 35 Spanish public universities responded to the Questionnaire on Combined Formative Modality. The results show that, although a high percentage of teachers say that they know how this modality works and the advantages it reports, the percentage of teachers that acknowledge not having integrated it into the courses they teach is high. On the other hand, although the training offered by universities is considered important for its implementation, the intention of use is positively correlated with the teacher’s self-perception of the resources and knowledge at their disposal. In this sense, it is important to point out the need to recognize, by higher education institutions, both the training and the adaptive work of teachers in the implementation of the combined training strategy.
高等教育bLearning的使用意图与教学自我认知
近年来,训练情况正在发生重大变化,主要是由于信息和通信技术的到来。其中一个变化被翻译成混合式学习,这是一种结合了面对面和在线教学的形成性方法,在教育领域受到广泛欢迎。虽然对这一模式的研究确实非常丰富,但对教师对混合式学习的接受和认知的研究似乎被忽视了。为此,本文提出了一项定量研究,重点研究大学教师对这种形成方式的看法。西班牙35所公立大学共982名教师参与了《组合构成情态问卷》。结果显示,尽管有很高比例的教师表示他们知道这种模式是如何运作的,以及它所带来的优势,但承认没有将其融入到他们所教课程中的教师比例很高。另一方面,虽然大学提供的培训被认为对其实施很重要,但使用意图与教师对其所掌握的资源和知识的自我认知呈正相关。从这个意义上说,必须指出,高等学校在实施联合培养战略时,既要认识到教师的培养工作,也要认识到教师的适应工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista De Educacion
Revista De Educacion EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista de Educación es una publicación científica del Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional español. Fundada en 1940, y manteniendo el título de Revista de Educación desde 1952, es un testigo privilegiado de la evolución de la educación en las últimas décadas, así como un reconocido medio de difusión de los avances en la investigación y la innovación en este campo, tanto desde una perspectiva nacional como internacional. La revista es editada por la Subdirección General de Atención al Ciudadano, Documentación y Publicaciones, y actualmente está adscrita al Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa de la Dirección General de Evaluación y Cooperación Territorial. Cada año se publican cuatro números con tres secciones: Investigaciones, Ensayos y Reseñas. Uno de los números anuales podrá contar con una sección Monográfica con convocatoria pública en esta web. Todos los artículos enviados a las diferentes secciones están sometidos a evaluación externa. En el primer número del año se incluye un índice bibliográfico, y en el segundo un editorial con la Memoria anual que recoge las principales estadísticas del proceso editor de ese período, los índices de calidad e impacto, así como el listado de revisores externos.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信