Narcissus in three acts

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Brad Evans, Chantal Meza
{"title":"Narcissus in three acts","authors":"Brad Evans, Chantal Meza","doi":"10.1080/10714413.2022.2066394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay will address the narcissism of techno-nihilism into which life is being thrown. Written by a political theorist and artist, it looks specifically at the way technology is colonizing the political and artistic imagination. The essay is written over three acts, which traverse the logics of space and time. Act 1 is written by Brad Evans and situated in the year 2038. Based in Zacatecas, Mexico, he imagines a world where the university is now fully digitalized and governed by the world’s tech-giants, whose reach also includes control over all the leading cultural centers. It offers a futurist critique of the role technology is having on the life of an academic and how he imagines it impacted on the broader cultural and political terrains into which life has become fully immersed. Act 2, written by Chantal Meza from the present moment, deals with the impending catastrophe technology promises for art and creative styles for living. Central here is the colonization of art and the poetic sensibility by the desiring machine, notably the arrival of the smart gallery and the artificial intelligence artist who has become key in the battle in denying the exceptionalism of art, leading to the evisceration of what it means to be human. The final act appears in a non-located space and time, which drawing the above analysis together and through mediating on the prevailing myths of the so-called technological revolution—including their flawed literal and theoretical assumptions, asks whether we can even imagine breaking free from this dystopian novella?","PeriodicalId":45129,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2022.2066394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This essay will address the narcissism of techno-nihilism into which life is being thrown. Written by a political theorist and artist, it looks specifically at the way technology is colonizing the political and artistic imagination. The essay is written over three acts, which traverse the logics of space and time. Act 1 is written by Brad Evans and situated in the year 2038. Based in Zacatecas, Mexico, he imagines a world where the university is now fully digitalized and governed by the world’s tech-giants, whose reach also includes control over all the leading cultural centers. It offers a futurist critique of the role technology is having on the life of an academic and how he imagines it impacted on the broader cultural and political terrains into which life has become fully immersed. Act 2, written by Chantal Meza from the present moment, deals with the impending catastrophe technology promises for art and creative styles for living. Central here is the colonization of art and the poetic sensibility by the desiring machine, notably the arrival of the smart gallery and the artificial intelligence artist who has become key in the battle in denying the exceptionalism of art, leading to the evisceration of what it means to be human. The final act appears in a non-located space and time, which drawing the above analysis together and through mediating on the prevailing myths of the so-called technological revolution—including their flawed literal and theoretical assumptions, asks whether we can even imagine breaking free from this dystopian novella?
那西塞斯有三幕
这篇文章将讨论技术虚无主义的自恋,生活正被抛入其中。这本书由一位政治理论家和艺术家撰写,专门探讨了技术如何殖民政治和艺术想象。这篇文章分为三幕,贯穿了空间和时间的逻辑。第一幕由布拉德·埃文斯编剧,故事发生在2038年。他在墨西哥的萨卡特卡斯(Zacatecas)设想了这样一个世界:大学现在完全数字化,由世界科技巨头管理,他们的影响力还包括控制所有主要的文化中心。它提供了一种未来主义的批判,批判技术在一个学者的生活中所扮演的角色,以及他如何想象它对更广泛的文化和政治领域的影响,而生活已经完全浸入其中。第二幕是由Chantal Meza从现在开始写的,讲述了技术对艺术和创造性生活方式所带来的即将到来的灾难。这里的核心是欲望机器对艺术和诗意感性的殖民,尤其是智能画廊和人工智能艺术家的到来,他们已经成为否认艺术例外论的关键,导致人类的意义被摘除。最后一幕出现在一个不确定的空间和时间,将上述分析结合在一起,并通过调解所谓的技术革命的流行神话-包括他们有缺陷的文字和理论假设,问我们是否可以想象从这个反乌托邦的中篇小说中解脱出来?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies
Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信