Les outils d’échafaudage numériques pour l’apprentissage de la résolution de problèmes complexes : analyse des déterminants de l’intention d’utilisation
{"title":"Les outils d’échafaudage numériques pour l’apprentissage de la résolution de problèmes complexes : analyse des déterminants de l’intention d’utilisation","authors":"Chantale Tremblay, Bruno Poellhuber, A. Kozanitis","doi":"10.18162/ritpu-2022-v19n3-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Les difficultés des apprenants en gestion quant à la résolution de problèmes complexes (RPC) justifient la pertinence de concevoir des outils d’échafaudage numériques (OÉN) pour les assister durant leur processus. Cette étude mixte vise à documenter leurs perceptions à l’égard de ces outils en s’appuyant sur les modèles d’acceptation de la technologie TAM ( Technology Acceptance Model ), TAM2 et TAM3. Les résultats montrent que la perception d’utilité et ses déterminants sont les principaux facteurs qui justifient l’usage. Des analyses factorielles Abstract Management learners’ difficulties in complex problems solving (CPS) justify the relevance of designing digital scaffolds (DS) to assist them during their process. This mixed-methods study aims to document their perceptions of these tools using the TAM (Technology Acceptance Model), TAM2 and TAM3 models. The results show that perceived usefulness and its determinants are the main factors that justify using them. Factor analyses suggest a link between the value given and its perceived usefulness, which could be explained by an expectation-value model. Recommendations for designing useful DS are then proposed.","PeriodicalId":41230,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18162/ritpu-2022-v19n3-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Les difficultés des apprenants en gestion quant à la résolution de problèmes complexes (RPC) justifient la pertinence de concevoir des outils d’échafaudage numériques (OÉN) pour les assister durant leur processus. Cette étude mixte vise à documenter leurs perceptions à l’égard de ces outils en s’appuyant sur les modèles d’acceptation de la technologie TAM ( Technology Acceptance Model ), TAM2 et TAM3. Les résultats montrent que la perception d’utilité et ses déterminants sont les principaux facteurs qui justifient l’usage. Des analyses factorielles Abstract Management learners’ difficulties in complex problems solving (CPS) justify the relevance of designing digital scaffolds (DS) to assist them during their process. This mixed-methods study aims to document their perceptions of these tools using the TAM (Technology Acceptance Model), TAM2 and TAM3 models. The results show that perceived usefulness and its determinants are the main factors that justify using them. Factor analyses suggest a link between the value given and its perceived usefulness, which could be explained by an expectation-value model. Recommendations for designing useful DS are then proposed.