Drug shortages: A systems view of the current state

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Kim E. van Oorschot, Luk N. Van Wassenhove, Marianne Jahre, Kostas Selviaridis, Harwin de Vries
{"title":"Drug shortages: A systems view of the current state","authors":"Kim E. van Oorschot,&nbsp;Luk N. Van Wassenhove,&nbsp;Marianne Jahre,&nbsp;Kostas Selviaridis,&nbsp;Harwin de Vries","doi":"10.1111/deci.12583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this thought leadership article is to create a systems view of drug shortages based on the perceptions of practitioners and policymakers. We develop a comprehensive framework describing what stakeholders are currently doing when faced with drug shortages and show the outcomes of their actions. In a review of practitioner literature and public reports published from 2010 to 2020, we identify cause-and-effect relationships related to generic drug shortages in six high-income European countries (Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the UK) in normal times. By combining and connecting data from these different sources, we develop a systems view of the current state. Though several of the associations covered in the systems view are well known, putting them all together and considering their interrelationships is what is offered by this research. Based on this systems view, we derive three basic solution archetypes for drug shortages: (1) let the market handle it; (2) search for alternatives; and (3) bend the rules. The interactions between these archetypes generate causal ambiguity making it harder to understand and solve the problem as the side effects of solutions can be missed. We show how the interaction of archetypes can compromise intended behavior or escalate unintended behavior. However, our systems view allows us to suggest higher-level solution archetypes that overrule such side effects. The basic and higher-order solution archetypes can provide baselines for research and support the development of future interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":"53 6","pages":"969-984"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/deci.12583","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12583","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this thought leadership article is to create a systems view of drug shortages based on the perceptions of practitioners and policymakers. We develop a comprehensive framework describing what stakeholders are currently doing when faced with drug shortages and show the outcomes of their actions. In a review of practitioner literature and public reports published from 2010 to 2020, we identify cause-and-effect relationships related to generic drug shortages in six high-income European countries (Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the UK) in normal times. By combining and connecting data from these different sources, we develop a systems view of the current state. Though several of the associations covered in the systems view are well known, putting them all together and considering their interrelationships is what is offered by this research. Based on this systems view, we derive three basic solution archetypes for drug shortages: (1) let the market handle it; (2) search for alternatives; and (3) bend the rules. The interactions between these archetypes generate causal ambiguity making it harder to understand and solve the problem as the side effects of solutions can be missed. We show how the interaction of archetypes can compromise intended behavior or escalate unintended behavior. However, our systems view allows us to suggest higher-level solution archetypes that overrule such side effects. The basic and higher-order solution archetypes can provide baselines for research and support the development of future interventions.

Abstract Image

药物短缺:当前状态的系统视图
这篇思想领导力文章的目的是基于从业者和政策制定者的看法,建立一个关于药物短缺的系统观点。我们制定了一个全面的框架,描述利益攸关方在面临药品短缺时目前正在做什么,并展示其行动的结果。在对2010年至2020年发表的从业者文献和公开报告的回顾中,我们确定了六个高收入欧洲国家(比利时、法国、荷兰、挪威、瑞典和英国)在正常时期与仿制药短缺相关的因果关系。通过组合和连接来自这些不同来源的数据,我们开发了当前状态的系统视图。虽然系统视图中涵盖的一些关联是众所周知的,但本研究提供的是将它们放在一起并考虑它们之间的相互关系。基于这一系统观点,我们推导出药品短缺的三种基本解决原型:(1)让市场来处理;(2)寻找替代方案;(3)违反规则。这些原型之间的相互作用产生了因果模糊性,使得理解和解决问题变得更加困难,因为解决方案的副作用可能会被忽略。我们展示了原型的相互作用如何损害预期的行为或升级意外的行为。然而,我们的系统视图允许我们建议更高层次的解决方案原型,以排除此类副作用。基本和高阶解决方案原型可以为研究提供基线,并支持未来干预措施的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DECISION SCIENCES
DECISION SCIENCES MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信