Drawing on Siedentop’s Legacy to Revisit Systematic Observation of Teaching: Identifying and Addressing Key Validity and Reliability Questions

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
N. Tsangaridou, Charalambos Y. Charalambous
{"title":"Drawing on Siedentop’s Legacy to Revisit Systematic Observation of Teaching: Identifying and Addressing Key Validity and Reliability Questions","authors":"N. Tsangaridou, Charalambos Y. Charalambous","doi":"10.1080/00336297.2022.2155980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Focusing on systematic observation, one of the most potent methods of studying teaching quality, represents one of the numerous contributions of Daryl Siedentop to the profession. While he had a clear focus on issues of validity and reliability concerning systematic observation, over the past decades, attention to such issues appears to have eroded. By drawing on Siedentop’s contribution to systematic observation and the guidance he provided on gathering quality data, in this paper we discuss the lessons learned from his work regarding what needs to be observed, how, by whom, and under what conditions – all addressing important validity and reliability issues. We argue that closely attending to these issues is critical not only for reinvigorating a research field initiated by scholars such as Siedentop but also for restoring its key role in studying teaching quality.","PeriodicalId":49642,"journal":{"name":"Quest","volume":"37 1","pages":"29 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quest","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2022.2155980","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Focusing on systematic observation, one of the most potent methods of studying teaching quality, represents one of the numerous contributions of Daryl Siedentop to the profession. While he had a clear focus on issues of validity and reliability concerning systematic observation, over the past decades, attention to such issues appears to have eroded. By drawing on Siedentop’s contribution to systematic observation and the guidance he provided on gathering quality data, in this paper we discuss the lessons learned from his work regarding what needs to be observed, how, by whom, and under what conditions – all addressing important validity and reliability issues. We argue that closely attending to these issues is critical not only for reinvigorating a research field initiated by scholars such as Siedentop but also for restoring its key role in studying teaching quality.
借鉴西登托普的遗产,重新审视教学的系统观察:识别和解决关键的有效性和可靠性问题
关注系统观察是研究教学质量最有效的方法之一,是西登托普对教学质量的众多贡献之一。虽然他对系统观测的有效性和可靠性问题有明确的关注,但在过去几十年里,对这些问题的关注似乎有所减弱。通过借鉴Siedentop对系统观察的贡献以及他提供的收集高质量数据的指导,在本文中,我们讨论了从他的工作中获得的经验教训,包括需要观察什么、如何观察、由谁观察、在什么条件下观察——所有这些都解决了重要的有效性和可靠性问题。我们认为,密切关注这些问题不仅对于重振西登托普等学者发起的研究领域至关重要,而且对于恢复其在研究教学质量方面的关键作用也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quest
Quest 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Quest is the official journal of the National Association for Kinesiology in Higher Education (NAKHE). It is the leading journal for interdisciplinary scholarship for professionals in kinesiology in higher education. Quest provides a public forum for scholarship, creative thought, and research relevant to a broad range of interests held by faculty and leaders in higher education today. Quest publishes: 1) manuscripts that address issues and concerns relevant and meaningful to the field of kinesiology; 2) original research reports that address empirical questions that are contextualized within higher education and hold significance to a broad range of faculty and administrators in kinesiology; and 3) reviews of literature and/or research of interest to one or more sub-disciplines in kinesiology. Quest does not publish papers focused on sport (e.g., amateur, collegiate, professional) that are contextualized outside of kinesiology in higher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信