{"title":"“Run it through me:” Positioning, power, and learning on a high school robotics team","authors":"Colin Hennessy Elliott","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2020.1770763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background: Scholars have analyzed the possibilities that robotics-centered learning programs offer, including opportunities for developing collaboratively and engaging in authentic STEM professional practice. This work adds a sociopolitical perspective, explicating a case of a newcomer to a robotics team that elucidates the nuances of in-the-moment social positioning and its enduring impact on youth’s participation in afterschool STEM learning environments. Methods: Through interaction analysis of three episodes and ethnographic perspectives, participants’ contributions to social interaction are analyzed as chronotopes, or spacetime representations, to understand how Denisse’s, a young Black and Latinx woman, role as the driver of the team’s robot at competitions is collaboratively crafted, building on the feminist tradition of positioning theory. Findings: My analysis shows that Denisse is both empowered, through co-production of future decision-making in practice, and disempowered, through the rejection of non-present spacetime storylines at the competition. Further, notions of expertise and ownership are brought to bear on interactions, together with racialized and gendered narratives across the negotiations of the role of the driver to limit Denisse’s local social power. Contribution: This story shares how representation is not enough for educational justice for minoritized youth and informs how STEM education communities must take on the task, together.","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":"19 1","pages":"598 - 641"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1770763","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background: Scholars have analyzed the possibilities that robotics-centered learning programs offer, including opportunities for developing collaboratively and engaging in authentic STEM professional practice. This work adds a sociopolitical perspective, explicating a case of a newcomer to a robotics team that elucidates the nuances of in-the-moment social positioning and its enduring impact on youth’s participation in afterschool STEM learning environments. Methods: Through interaction analysis of three episodes and ethnographic perspectives, participants’ contributions to social interaction are analyzed as chronotopes, or spacetime representations, to understand how Denisse’s, a young Black and Latinx woman, role as the driver of the team’s robot at competitions is collaboratively crafted, building on the feminist tradition of positioning theory. Findings: My analysis shows that Denisse is both empowered, through co-production of future decision-making in practice, and disempowered, through the rejection of non-present spacetime storylines at the competition. Further, notions of expertise and ownership are brought to bear on interactions, together with racialized and gendered narratives across the negotiations of the role of the driver to limit Denisse’s local social power. Contribution: This story shares how representation is not enough for educational justice for minoritized youth and informs how STEM education communities must take on the task, together.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the Learning Sciences (JLS) is one of the two official journals of the International Society of the Learning Sciences ( www.isls.org). JLS provides a multidisciplinary forum for research on education and learning that informs theories of how people learn and the design of learning environments. It publishes research that elucidates processes of learning, and the ways in which technologies, instructional practices, and learning environments can be designed to support learning in different contexts. JLS articles draw on theoretical frameworks from such diverse fields as cognitive science, sociocultural theory, educational psychology, computer science, and anthropology. Submissions are not limited to any particular research method, but must be based on rigorous analyses that present new insights into how people learn and/or how learning can be supported and enhanced. Successful submissions should position their argument within extant literature in the learning sciences. They should reflect the core practices and foci that have defined the learning sciences as a field: privileging design in methodology and pedagogy; emphasizing interdisciplinarity and methodological innovation; grounding research in real-world contexts; answering questions about learning process and mechanism, alongside outcomes; pursuing technological and pedagogical innovation; and maintaining a strong connection between research and practice.