The Historical Divergences and Contemporary Convergence of Social Rights

IF 7.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Guo Zhonghua
{"title":"The Historical Divergences and Contemporary Convergence of Social Rights","authors":"Guo Zhonghua","doi":"10.47297/WSPSPRWSP2515-471001.20200401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social right is one of the basic elements of citizenship rights. The aim of the social right is to guarantee people’s survival rights. Through the combinaIII tion with regime, nationalism and capitalism, social right exhibits different existIII ing models in history. In the second half of 19th century, after social right comIII bined with nationalism and authoritarian regime it exhibited an authoritarian modIII el in which social rights performed both functions of improving people’s life and promoting legitimacy of the authoritarian regime. Liberal capitalism model of soIII cial right was the production of the adhering combination between social right and capitalism in which the former distorted its own value to serve the latter’s develIII opment. And welfare state model was the antagonisticcombination between social right and capitalism in which social right got the regime’s protection and set itself in a ’warlike relationship with the capitalism. In the late 20 century, the trends of globalization, post-nation state and post-industrialisation drove the social right into a convergent development orbit which reflected by Anthony Giddens posiIII tive welfare thought.","PeriodicalId":47129,"journal":{"name":"Social Issues and Policy Review","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Issues and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47297/WSPSPRWSP2515-471001.20200401","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social right is one of the basic elements of citizenship rights. The aim of the social right is to guarantee people’s survival rights. Through the combinaIII tion with regime, nationalism and capitalism, social right exhibits different existIII ing models in history. In the second half of 19th century, after social right comIII bined with nationalism and authoritarian regime it exhibited an authoritarian modIII el in which social rights performed both functions of improving people’s life and promoting legitimacy of the authoritarian regime. Liberal capitalism model of soIII cial right was the production of the adhering combination between social right and capitalism in which the former distorted its own value to serve the latter’s develIII opment. And welfare state model was the antagonisticcombination between social right and capitalism in which social right got the regime’s protection and set itself in a ’warlike relationship with the capitalism. In the late 20 century, the trends of globalization, post-nation state and post-industrialisation drove the social right into a convergent development orbit which reflected by Anthony Giddens posiIII tive welfare thought.
社会权利的历史分歧与当代趋同
社会权利是公民权利的基本要素之一。社会权利的目的是保障人的生存权利。通过与政权、民族主义和资本主义的结合,社会权利在历史上呈现出不同的存在模式。19世纪下半叶,社会权利与民族主义和专制政权相结合后,呈现出一种专制主义的形态,即社会权利既具有改善人民生活的功能,又具有促进专制政权合法性的功能。自由资本主义社会权利模式是社会权利与资本主义紧密结合的产物,是资本主义扭曲自身价值服务于资本主义发展的产物。福利国家模式是社会权利与资本主义的对抗结合,社会权利得到政权的保护,并与资本主义建立了“战争关系”。20世纪后期,全球化、后民族国家和后工业化的趋势推动社会权利进入趋同的发展轨道,吉登斯积极的福利思想体现了这一趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.20
自引率
1.10%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The mission of Social Issues and Policy Review (SIPR) is to provide state of the art and timely theoretical and empirical reviews of topics and programs of research that are directly relevant to understanding and addressing social issues and public policy.Papers will be accessible and relevant to a broad audience and will normally be based on a program of research. Works in SIPR will represent perspectives directly relevant to the psychological study of social issues and public policy. Contributions are expected to be review papers that present a strong scholarly foundation and consider how research and theory can inform social issues and policy or articulate the implication of social issues and public policy for theory and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信