Teaching poems by authors of colour at key stage 3: categorising what is taught

IF 1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Victoria Elliott, M. Courtney
{"title":"Teaching poems by authors of colour at key stage 3: categorising what is taught","authors":"Victoria Elliott, M. Courtney","doi":"10.1080/04250494.2023.2191626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper draws on a survey conducted in 2020–21 in which 163 secondary English teachers in England named a total of 68 individual poems by poets of colour from the global majority which they taught in Key Stage 3 (students aged 11–14). Using the concepts of framing and mental schemas, we categorised these poems by considering which was the most likely frame or theme under which they would be taught. The largest category was Identity (15 poems), followed by War and Conflict (12 poems) and Racism (11 poems). War and Conflict, together with Love and Relationships (7 poems) are categories which reflect GCSE groups of poems. We suggest that poems by global majority poets which are incorporated into the curriculum are likely to be largely framed as being about race or related issues. The exception is the “strong” framing of the GCSE clusters. We argue that this is a shortfall in the ways in which the curriculum is being diversified. We note the long shadow of “Poetry from Other Cultures” and suggest that we need both more poems from global majority authors and more variety in the themes which they explore.","PeriodicalId":44722,"journal":{"name":"English in Education","volume":"27 1","pages":"91 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2023.2191626","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper draws on a survey conducted in 2020–21 in which 163 secondary English teachers in England named a total of 68 individual poems by poets of colour from the global majority which they taught in Key Stage 3 (students aged 11–14). Using the concepts of framing and mental schemas, we categorised these poems by considering which was the most likely frame or theme under which they would be taught. The largest category was Identity (15 poems), followed by War and Conflict (12 poems) and Racism (11 poems). War and Conflict, together with Love and Relationships (7 poems) are categories which reflect GCSE groups of poems. We suggest that poems by global majority poets which are incorporated into the curriculum are likely to be largely framed as being about race or related issues. The exception is the “strong” framing of the GCSE clusters. We argue that this is a shortfall in the ways in which the curriculum is being diversified. We note the long shadow of “Poetry from Other Cultures” and suggest that we need both more poems from global majority authors and more variety in the themes which they explore.
在关键阶段3教授有色作家的诗歌:分类所教的内容
本文借鉴了2020 - 2021年进行的一项调查,在调查中,英国163名中学英语教师列出了他们在关键阶段3(11-14岁学生)教授的来自全球大多数有色人种诗人的68首诗。使用框架和心理图式的概念,我们通过考虑最可能的框架或主题来对这些诗歌进行分类。最多的类别是“身份”(15首),其次是“战争与冲突”(12首)和“种族主义”(11首)。战争和冲突,以及爱情和关系(7首诗)是反映GCSE诗歌群体的类别。我们建议,被纳入课程的全球主流诗人的诗歌可能主要是关于种族或相关问题的。例外是GCSE集群的“强”框架。我们认为,这是课程多样化方式的不足。我们注意到“来自其他文化的诗歌”的长期阴影,并建议我们既需要更多来自全球主流作家的诗歌,也需要他们探索的主题更多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
English in Education
English in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信