Defining Success in a Language MOOC From Learner Perspectives

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Napat Jitpaisarnwattana, Pornapit Darasawang, H. Reinders
{"title":"Defining Success in a Language MOOC From Learner Perspectives","authors":"Napat Jitpaisarnwattana, Pornapit Darasawang, H. Reinders","doi":"10.4018/ijcallt.291108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite their popularity, there remains a challenge as to how success should be measured in Language MOOCs. Although traditional metrics such as completion rates have often been adopted, they have failed to take into account the fact that learners enrol in LMOOCs with different learning goals. This study examined how success is perceived in an LMOOC on English presentations from learners’ perspectives. Data were collected through 137 questionnaire responses and 22 semi-structured interviews. The quantitative results showed that the majority of learners who completed the course, as well as those who dropped out, thought that they were successful in learning in this LMOOC. Qualitative results showed that course completion was not the primary reason for their perceived success. Rather, they attributed their success to learning specific aspects of the course, language development, applications of the content to their work or study and achieving their learning goals. The authors conclude with suggestions and implications as to how success can be measured in future LMOOC implementation.","PeriodicalId":43610,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.291108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite their popularity, there remains a challenge as to how success should be measured in Language MOOCs. Although traditional metrics such as completion rates have often been adopted, they have failed to take into account the fact that learners enrol in LMOOCs with different learning goals. This study examined how success is perceived in an LMOOC on English presentations from learners’ perspectives. Data were collected through 137 questionnaire responses and 22 semi-structured interviews. The quantitative results showed that the majority of learners who completed the course, as well as those who dropped out, thought that they were successful in learning in this LMOOC. Qualitative results showed that course completion was not the primary reason for their perceived success. Rather, they attributed their success to learning specific aspects of the course, language development, applications of the content to their work or study and achieving their learning goals. The authors conclude with suggestions and implications as to how success can be measured in future LMOOC implementation.
从学习者的角度定义语言MOOC的成功
尽管它们很受欢迎,但如何衡量语言mooc的成功仍是一个挑战。尽管完成率等传统指标经常被采用,但它们未能考虑到学习者参加LMOOCs的学习目标不同这一事实。本研究从学习者的角度考察了在LMOOC英语演讲中如何感知成功。通过137份问卷和22份半结构化访谈收集数据。定量结果显示,大多数完成课程的学习者和辍学的学习者都认为他们在LMOOC中学习成功。定性结果显示,完成课程并不是他们认为成功的主要原因。相反,他们将自己的成功归功于学习课程的特定方面、语言发展、将课程内容应用于工作或学习以及实现学习目标。最后,作者就如何在未来的LMOOC实施中衡量成功提出了建议和启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The mission of the International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT) is to publish research, theory, and conceptually-based papers that address the use and impact of and innovations in education technologies in advancing foreign/second language learning and teaching. This journal expands on the principles, theories, designs, discussion, and implementations of computer-assisted language learning. In addition to original research papers and submissions on theory and concept development and systematic reports of practice, this journal welcomes theory-based CALL-related book and software/application reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信