Unpacking complex phenomena through qualitative inquiry: The case of teacher identity research

IF 14.3 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. Hong, Dionne Cross Francis
{"title":"Unpacking complex phenomena through qualitative inquiry: The case of teacher identity research","authors":"J. Hong, Dionne Cross Francis","doi":"10.1080/00461520.2020.1783265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Despite the key contributions of qualitative inquiry in developing deeper understandings of people’s lived experiences within varied contexts, the field of educational psychology has not been fully engaged in understanding, advancing, and advocating qualitative inquiry. In this article, we unpacked the processes, affordances, and challenges in conducting qualitative studies in the context of researching teacher identity. We discussed our constructionism epistemological assumptions, the kind of research questions we were proposing, and related methodological choices including longitudinal qualitative research and case study. Concrete methods to generate thick descriptions were addressed including purposeful sampling, various forms of data, and inductive analysis procedures. Questions and challenges related to trustworthiness of qualitative research and our approaches to attending to them were also discussed. This article illustrates how and why employing qualitative inquiry is beneficial for unpacking complex phenomena such as teacher identity, and contributes to advancing methodological diversity within the field of educational psychology.","PeriodicalId":48361,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychologist","volume":"68 1","pages":"208 - 219"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1783265","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Abstract Despite the key contributions of qualitative inquiry in developing deeper understandings of people’s lived experiences within varied contexts, the field of educational psychology has not been fully engaged in understanding, advancing, and advocating qualitative inquiry. In this article, we unpacked the processes, affordances, and challenges in conducting qualitative studies in the context of researching teacher identity. We discussed our constructionism epistemological assumptions, the kind of research questions we were proposing, and related methodological choices including longitudinal qualitative research and case study. Concrete methods to generate thick descriptions were addressed including purposeful sampling, various forms of data, and inductive analysis procedures. Questions and challenges related to trustworthiness of qualitative research and our approaches to attending to them were also discussed. This article illustrates how and why employing qualitative inquiry is beneficial for unpacking complex phenomena such as teacher identity, and contributes to advancing methodological diversity within the field of educational psychology.
用质性探究解析复杂现象:以教师身份研究为例
尽管定性探究在加深对不同背景下人们生活经历的理解方面做出了重要贡献,但教育心理学领域尚未充分参与理解、推进和倡导定性探究。在本文中,我们揭示了在教师身份研究的背景下进行定性研究的过程、启示和挑战。我们讨论了我们的建构主义认识论假设,我们提出的研究问题类型,以及相关的方法论选择,包括纵向定性研究和案例研究。具体的方法来产生厚的描述,包括有目的的抽样,各种形式的数据,归纳分析程序。还讨论了与定性研究的可信度相关的问题和挑战,以及我们应对这些问题的方法。本文阐述了如何以及为什么采用定性调查有利于解开复杂的现象,如教师身份,并有助于推进教育心理学领域的方法多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Educational Psychologist is a scholarly journal dedicated to exploring the psychology of learning and instruction. Articles in this journal encompass a diverse range of perspectives, from examining psychological mechanisms to exploring social and societal phenomena related to learning and instruction. The journal publishes theoretical and conceptual articles, as well as reviews and meta-analyses, that significantly contribute to theory or advance the methods used to explore educational psychology. Emphasizing innovation and advancing understanding, the journal does not publish articles solely reporting the methods and results of empirical studies; instead, all submissions, including reviews and meta-analyses, must offer clear implications for advancing theory. In addition to regular articles, the journal features special issues that delve into important themes in educational psychology, along with focal articles accompanied by peer commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信