The Effectiveness of Financial Capability and Asset Building Interventions in Improving Youth’s Educational Well-being: A Systematic Review

IF 4.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
David Ansong, Moses Okumu, Thabani Nyoni, Jamal Appiah-Kubi, Emmanuel Owusu Amoako, Isaac Koomson, Jamie Conklin
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Financial Capability and Asset Building Interventions in Improving Youth’s Educational Well-being: A Systematic Review","authors":"David Ansong,&nbsp;Moses Okumu,&nbsp;Thabani Nyoni,&nbsp;Jamal Appiah-Kubi,&nbsp;Emmanuel Owusu Amoako,&nbsp;Isaac Koomson,&nbsp;Jamie Conklin","doi":"10.1007/s40894-023-00223-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Researchers globally are testing the potential of economic empowerment interventions such as financial guidance, education savings accounts, and asset transfer to promote educational well-being. Yet limited evidence exists of these interventions’ quality and effectiveness in improving educational well-being outcomes such as school enrollment and academic achievement. This systematic review evaluates these interventions’ methodological strengths and weaknesses, describes common intervention components and outcomes measured, and assesses intervention effectiveness. Overall, 15 studies from Sub-Saharan Africa, North and Central America, Southeast Asia, and Europe were included in this review (age: 5–19 years). Over half of the intervention studies scored at/above the median (high rigor). Notable strengths include using experimental study designs, articulation of theoretical framework, longer follow-up periods, transparency about dropout/attrition rates, and the conduct of parallel intervention replications across multiple schools. Methodological weaknesses included not stating quality control measures and not reporting measurement validity and reliability. Overall, most interventions effectively improved educational well-being. Interventions were most effective at improving academic attendance/participation, performance, and achievement, and less effective in educational enrollment. As education is a key modifiable determinant of well-being, interventionists have a great opportunity to develop and implement tailored economic empowerment interventions to promote educational well-being.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45912,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Research Review","volume":"9 4","pages":"647 - 662"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40894-023-00223-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers globally are testing the potential of economic empowerment interventions such as financial guidance, education savings accounts, and asset transfer to promote educational well-being. Yet limited evidence exists of these interventions’ quality and effectiveness in improving educational well-being outcomes such as school enrollment and academic achievement. This systematic review evaluates these interventions’ methodological strengths and weaknesses, describes common intervention components and outcomes measured, and assesses intervention effectiveness. Overall, 15 studies from Sub-Saharan Africa, North and Central America, Southeast Asia, and Europe were included in this review (age: 5–19 years). Over half of the intervention studies scored at/above the median (high rigor). Notable strengths include using experimental study designs, articulation of theoretical framework, longer follow-up periods, transparency about dropout/attrition rates, and the conduct of parallel intervention replications across multiple schools. Methodological weaknesses included not stating quality control measures and not reporting measurement validity and reliability. Overall, most interventions effectively improved educational well-being. Interventions were most effective at improving academic attendance/participation, performance, and achievement, and less effective in educational enrollment. As education is a key modifiable determinant of well-being, interventionists have a great opportunity to develop and implement tailored economic empowerment interventions to promote educational well-being.

Abstract Image

财务能力和资产建设干预措施在改善青少年教育福祉方面的效果:系统回顾
全球研究人员正在测试经济赋权干预措施(如财务指导、教育储蓄账户和资产转移)在促进教育福祉方面的潜力。然而,关于这些干预措施在改善入学率和学业成绩等教育福祉成果方面的质量和有效性的证据却很有限。本系统性综述评估了这些干预措施在方法论上的优缺点,描述了常见的干预措施内容和测量结果,并评估了干预措施的有效性。本综述共纳入了来自撒哈拉以南非洲、北美和中美洲、东南亚以及欧洲的 15 项研究(年龄:5-19 岁)。一半以上的干预研究得分达到/超过中位数(高度严谨)。值得注意的优点包括采用实验研究设计、阐明理论框架、较长的随访期、辍学率/减员率的透明度以及在多所学校进行平行干预复制。方法上的不足包括没有说明质量控制措施,没有报告测量的有效性和可靠性。总体而言,大多数干预措施都有效地改善了教育福祉。干预措施在提高出勤率/参与率、学习成绩和成就方面最为有效,而在提高入学率方面效果较差。由于教育是决定幸福感的一个关键可变因素,因此干预者有很大机会制定和实施有针对性的经济赋权干预措施,以促进教育幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Adolescent Research Review
Adolescent Research Review PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Adolescent Research Review publishes articles that review important contributions to the understanding of adolescence.  The Review draws from the many subdisciplines of developmental science, psychological science, education, criminology, public health, medicine, social work, and other allied disciplines that address the subject of youth and adolescence. The editors are especially interested in articles that bridge gaps between disciplines or that focus on topics that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries.  Reviews must be cutting edge and comprehensive in the way they advance science, practice or policy relating to adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信