Kylie Lipscombe, Kellie Buckley-Walker, Sharon K Tindall-Ford
{"title":"Middle leaders’ facilitation of teacher learning in collaborative teams","authors":"Kylie Lipscombe, Kellie Buckley-Walker, Sharon K Tindall-Ford","doi":"10.1080/13632434.2023.2215803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There is an increased focus on schools and school systems to develop teaching teams to improve school teaching and learning practices. As such, effectual school leadership has become synonymous with creating the conditions for teachers to work collaboratively to improve school teaching and learning. Middle leaders, teachers who are formally appointed to a leadership role, operate between senior leaders and teachers, are often responsible for leading teacher teams and facilitating the communicative space so that collaboration leads to positive outcomes for teacher practice and student learning. However, there is a lack of conceptual understanding of the micro-processes middle leaders enact when facilitating teacher teams and how facilitation impacts new or different teaching and collaborative practices. Drawing on the theory of practice architecture, we interrogate data from interviews, observations, and artefacts in three case study schools in Australia, to understand facilitation through the modes of action (doings), forms of understandings (sayings), and ways in which participants relate to one another and the world (relatings). Analysis of data revealed middle leader facilitation is consequential to how teacher team operate and that six ecologies of facilitation practices are typically enacted by middle leaders: procedural management, regulating interactions, expert guidance, purposeful dialogue, decision-making, and social-emotional support.","PeriodicalId":47255,"journal":{"name":"School Leadership & Management","volume":"80 1","pages":"301 - 321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Leadership & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2023.2215803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT There is an increased focus on schools and school systems to develop teaching teams to improve school teaching and learning practices. As such, effectual school leadership has become synonymous with creating the conditions for teachers to work collaboratively to improve school teaching and learning. Middle leaders, teachers who are formally appointed to a leadership role, operate between senior leaders and teachers, are often responsible for leading teacher teams and facilitating the communicative space so that collaboration leads to positive outcomes for teacher practice and student learning. However, there is a lack of conceptual understanding of the micro-processes middle leaders enact when facilitating teacher teams and how facilitation impacts new or different teaching and collaborative practices. Drawing on the theory of practice architecture, we interrogate data from interviews, observations, and artefacts in three case study schools in Australia, to understand facilitation through the modes of action (doings), forms of understandings (sayings), and ways in which participants relate to one another and the world (relatings). Analysis of data revealed middle leader facilitation is consequential to how teacher team operate and that six ecologies of facilitation practices are typically enacted by middle leaders: procedural management, regulating interactions, expert guidance, purposeful dialogue, decision-making, and social-emotional support.
期刊介绍:
School Leadership & Management welcomes articles on all aspects of educational leadership and management. As a highly cited and internationally known SCOPUS journal, School Leadership and Management is fundamentally concerned with issues of leadership and management in classrooms, schools, and school systems. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes articles that contribute to the field in the following ways: Scholarly articles that draw upon empirical evidence to provide new insights into leadership and management practices; Scholarly articles that explore alternative, critical, and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management; Scholarly articles that provide state of the art reviews within an national or international context; Scholarly articles reporting new empirical findings that make an original contribution to the field; Scholarly articles that make a theoretical contribution which extends and deepens our understanding of the key issues associated with leadership, management, and the direct relationship with organisational change and improvement; Scholarly articles that focus primarily upon leadership and management issues but are aimed at academic, policymaking and practitioner audiences; Contributions from policymakers and practitioners, where there is a clear leadership and management focus. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes: •articles that explore alternative, critical and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management •articles that are written for academics but are aimed at both a practitioner and academic audience •contributions from practitioners, provided that the relationship between theory and practice is made explicit.