Concept analysis of the theories used to develop educational podcasts

IF 1.4 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Scott W. T. McNamara, C. Drew
{"title":"Concept analysis of the theories used to develop educational podcasts","authors":"Scott W. T. McNamara, C. Drew","doi":"10.1080/09523987.2019.1681107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research on educational podcasts’ impacts on learning has steadily increased in recent years. Within this research, several issues related to methodology in educational podcast research have been cited. These include lack of detail, lack of reporting reliability, and questionable validity of testing instruments. However, one the theoretical frameworks that guide podcast development processes have received minimal attention. To address the lack of attention to theoretical frameworks within the educational podcasting literature, this paper utilized a conceptual analysis to examine key theoretical frameworks that have been used in empirical studies of educational podcasts. By examining theoretical frameworks used within relevant research, this paper introduces the value of using applicable learning theories to guide podcast development. Three theoretical frameworks are discussed: (a) the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning, (b) adult learning theories (e.g., andragogy theory), and (c) a combination of the two. The paper shows both the versatility of educational podcasts and the need for further examination of how different theoretical frameworks may underpin the development of podcasts across unique learning environments.","PeriodicalId":46439,"journal":{"name":"Educational Media International","volume":"49 1","pages":"300 - 312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Media International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2019.1681107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research on educational podcasts’ impacts on learning has steadily increased in recent years. Within this research, several issues related to methodology in educational podcast research have been cited. These include lack of detail, lack of reporting reliability, and questionable validity of testing instruments. However, one the theoretical frameworks that guide podcast development processes have received minimal attention. To address the lack of attention to theoretical frameworks within the educational podcasting literature, this paper utilized a conceptual analysis to examine key theoretical frameworks that have been used in empirical studies of educational podcasts. By examining theoretical frameworks used within relevant research, this paper introduces the value of using applicable learning theories to guide podcast development. Three theoretical frameworks are discussed: (a) the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning, (b) adult learning theories (e.g., andragogy theory), and (c) a combination of the two. The paper shows both the versatility of educational podcasts and the need for further examination of how different theoretical frameworks may underpin the development of podcasts across unique learning environments.
用于开发教育播客的理论概念分析
近年来,关于教育播客对学习影响的研究稳步增加。在本研究中,引用了几个与教育播客研究方法相关的问题。这些问题包括缺乏细节,缺乏报告可靠性,以及测试工具的有效性有问题。然而,指导播客开发过程的理论框架之一却很少受到关注。为了解决教育播客文献中对理论框架缺乏关注的问题,本文利用概念分析来检查已用于教育播客实证研究的关键理论框架。通过对相关研究中使用的理论框架的考察,本文介绍了应用学习理论指导播客发展的价值。本文讨论了三个理论框架:(a)多媒体学习的认知理论,(b)成人学习理论(如两性学理论),以及(c)两者的结合。这篇论文既展示了教育播客的多功能性,也展示了进一步研究不同理论框架如何在独特的学习环境中支持播客发展的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Media International
Educational Media International EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信