MALAYSIAN PROPERTY MARKET, THE STOCK MARKET AND MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES

Q2 Social Sciences
Tajul Ariffin Mohd Idris
{"title":"MALAYSIAN PROPERTY MARKET, THE STOCK MARKET AND MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES","authors":"Tajul Ariffin Mohd Idris","doi":"10.21837/pm.v21i27.1285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the interactions and linkages between the property market, stock market, and macroeconomic variables. The stock market, in the long run, has a significant impact on property. Changes in house prices and stock markets have wealth and credit-price effects spilled over to economic growth. Both property and equity markets have a close dependency on income, inflation and monetary policy. The inference and dynamic relationship within asset markets have the capacity to explain the boom and bust cycles. The great potential lies with property and stock market interaction mechanisms to reflect economic conditions and as a source to enrich the present macroeconomic indicators. The Malaysian equity market was observed to be significantly co-integrated with the disaggregated real estate market (state level). The real estate market was mainly found to have a positive relationship with the stock market, GDP per capita (income) and consumer price index (CPI). However, real estate always had a negative relationship with interest rates. While real estate had a positive relationship with real GDP per capita in the long run, the relationship was not significant. This insignificance relationship covers all states and property types. The income coefficients were low and most of non-causality in the short run. This suggests a need for cautious from house price overheating. Price upsurge beyond the reach of the public may get caught with a sudden decline of the people’s affordability level. The impact of property price increase was higher than CPI (inflation). The inflation positive response on property is unusual as it normally follows the interest rate being negative. The shortage of affordable houses has pushed up prices. Inflation coefficients were mainly significant and much higher compared to stock and income coefficients. In short term dynamic linkages, bidirectional causality was detected between lending rates and the overall property market. This suggests a high temporal impact of monetary policy on the property market at the national level.","PeriodicalId":38852,"journal":{"name":"Planning Malaysia","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planning Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i27.1285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the interactions and linkages between the property market, stock market, and macroeconomic variables. The stock market, in the long run, has a significant impact on property. Changes in house prices and stock markets have wealth and credit-price effects spilled over to economic growth. Both property and equity markets have a close dependency on income, inflation and monetary policy. The inference and dynamic relationship within asset markets have the capacity to explain the boom and bust cycles. The great potential lies with property and stock market interaction mechanisms to reflect economic conditions and as a source to enrich the present macroeconomic indicators. The Malaysian equity market was observed to be significantly co-integrated with the disaggregated real estate market (state level). The real estate market was mainly found to have a positive relationship with the stock market, GDP per capita (income) and consumer price index (CPI). However, real estate always had a negative relationship with interest rates. While real estate had a positive relationship with real GDP per capita in the long run, the relationship was not significant. This insignificance relationship covers all states and property types. The income coefficients were low and most of non-causality in the short run. This suggests a need for cautious from house price overheating. Price upsurge beyond the reach of the public may get caught with a sudden decline of the people’s affordability level. The impact of property price increase was higher than CPI (inflation). The inflation positive response on property is unusual as it normally follows the interest rate being negative. The shortage of affordable houses has pushed up prices. Inflation coefficients were mainly significant and much higher compared to stock and income coefficients. In short term dynamic linkages, bidirectional causality was detected between lending rates and the overall property market. This suggests a high temporal impact of monetary policy on the property market at the national level.
马来西亚房地产市场、股市和宏观经济变量
本研究考察了房地产市场、股票市场和宏观经济变量之间的相互作用和联系。从长远来看,股市对房地产有重大影响。房价和股票市场的变化对财富和信贷价格的影响溢出到经济增长中。房地产和股票市场都密切依赖于收入、通胀和货币政策。资产市场内部的推理和动态关系具有解释繁荣与萧条周期的能力。房地产和股票市场的互动机制反映经济状况,并作为丰富当前宏观经济指标的来源,潜力巨大。观察到马来西亚股票市场与分解的房地产市场(州一级)显着协整。房地产市场主要与股票市场、人均GDP(收入)和消费者价格指数(CPI)呈正相关。然而,房地产始终与利率呈负相关。从长期来看,房地产与实际人均GDP呈正相关,但关系并不显著。这种无关紧要的关系涵盖了所有状态和属性类型。收入系数较低,且短期内无因果关系。这表明有必要对房价过热保持谨慎。超出公众承受能力的价格上涨可能会随着人们承受能力的突然下降而陷入困境。房价上涨的影响大于CPI(通货膨胀)。房地产对通胀的积极反应是不寻常的,因为它通常是在利率为负之后出现的。经济适用房的短缺推高了房价。通货膨胀系数主要是显著的,比股票和收入系数高得多。在短期动态联系中,发现贷款利率与整体房地产市场之间存在双向因果关系。这表明,在国家层面上,货币政策对房地产市场的时间影响很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Planning Malaysia
Planning Malaysia Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信