Youth participation: a new approach based on the intersections between models, views and European policies

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
R. Barros, Angélica Monteiro, Carlinda Leite
{"title":"Youth participation: a new approach based on the intersections between models, views and European policies","authors":"R. Barros, Angélica Monteiro, Carlinda Leite","doi":"10.13042/bordon.2022.89318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION. Education policies have indicated the importance of youth participation in schools, which is one of the European Goals within the EU Youth Strategy framed by the EU youth policy cooperation for 2019-2027. The subject of youth participation refers to multiple definitions and diverse theoretical frameworks, which show the difficulty of finding a consensual definition or approach. The main objective of the current paper is to characterize youth participation models and to identify how those models convey different views, establishing possible connections with political discourses. METHOD. The study is based on an interpretive perspective. Data was collected by documentary analysis of 28 models of youth participation, which were analysed in the light of four pre-established categories: orthodox, multidimensional participation, qualitative and non-conformist. RESULTS. The majority of the 28 models of youth participation were specifically designed for children and young people; they fit a bottom-up perspective and were focused on non-formal education contexts. In addition, these models underline a multidimensional view of participation. DISCUSSION. The results evidence a trend towards considering an ideological relationship between youth participation and democracy, as advocated in European youth policies.","PeriodicalId":45710,"journal":{"name":"Bordon-Revista de Pedagogia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bordon-Revista de Pedagogia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13042/bordon.2022.89318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. Education policies have indicated the importance of youth participation in schools, which is one of the European Goals within the EU Youth Strategy framed by the EU youth policy cooperation for 2019-2027. The subject of youth participation refers to multiple definitions and diverse theoretical frameworks, which show the difficulty of finding a consensual definition or approach. The main objective of the current paper is to characterize youth participation models and to identify how those models convey different views, establishing possible connections with political discourses. METHOD. The study is based on an interpretive perspective. Data was collected by documentary analysis of 28 models of youth participation, which were analysed in the light of four pre-established categories: orthodox, multidimensional participation, qualitative and non-conformist. RESULTS. The majority of the 28 models of youth participation were specifically designed for children and young people; they fit a bottom-up perspective and were focused on non-formal education contexts. In addition, these models underline a multidimensional view of participation. DISCUSSION. The results evidence a trend towards considering an ideological relationship between youth participation and democracy, as advocated in European youth policies.
青年参与:一种基于模式、观点和欧洲政策交叉的新方法
介绍。教育政策表明了青年参与学校教育的重要性,这是2019-2027年欧盟青年政策合作框架下的欧盟青年战略中的欧洲目标之一。青年参与主题涉及多种定义和不同的理论框架,这表明很难找到一个共识的定义或方法。本文的主要目的是描述青年参与模式的特征,并确定这些模式如何传达不同的观点,建立与政治话语的可能联系。方法。本研究基于解释性视角。数据是通过对28种青年参与模式的文献分析收集的,这些模型是根据四种预先建立的类别进行分析的:正统、多维参与、定性和非墨守成规。结果。在28种青年参与模式中,大多数是专门为儿童和青年设计的;它们符合自下而上的观点,并侧重于非正规教育背景。此外,这些模式强调了参与的多维视角。讨论。结果表明,正如欧洲青年政策所提倡的那样,人们倾向于考虑青年参与与民主之间的意识形态关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bordon-Revista de Pedagogia
Bordon-Revista de Pedagogia EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Bordon. Journal of Education (ISSN: 0210-5934, e-ISSN: 2340-6577), the publication of the Spanish Pedagogical Society, published continuously since 1949. Originally a monthly publication until 1973, it is now published quarterly. It is a scientific journal in the field of education and gives a humanistic and universal view as an aid for education professionals. The purpose of Bordon is expressed in its presentation article (Issue 1, Year 1, May 1949), highly significant for the cultural moment of the times, and in which it makes this brief statement: “We are attempting to provide a service to education in Spain and even worldwide. As grand as our intention may be, we still believe in simplicity. We are not upset by the risk of failure; if Bordón only becomes of interest in the world of culture and education, we will thank God for helping us hit the mark; if, however, we were to see that we do know how to achieve our goal, we would calmly but perhaps slightly melancholically allow this newborn journal to die. And perhaps in this presence of possible failure may be found the greatest guarantee of continuity, because it will be for us like a permanent call of alert.” Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía is present in all the major indices of scientific quality such as the European Reference Index for the Humanities Proquest, Ebsco… Two external reviewers evaluate all its articles, in accordance with the double-blind peer review system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信