{"title":"Meeting the needs of highly able readers in the primary classroom: teachers’ perceptions in China and Scotland","authors":"Tingzhao Zhang","doi":"10.1080/00131911.2021.2001437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study explored regular classroom teachers’ perceptions of highly able readers and their actual practice of gifted education in the educational contexts of China and Scotland. This study is qualitative in nature and questionnaires and interviews were used to gather data in Chinese and Scottish public primary schools. The analysis indicated that many teachers in both countries believed that compared to their similar-aged peers, highly able readers could demonstrate advanced linguistic, cognitive and socioemotional abilities, and additional support was needed to develop reading ability. However, divergence emerged in terms of the role of school education. While Scottish teachers believed that highly able readers could be developed by school education, Chinese teachers believed that the role of school education was to provide basic education rather than enriched and additional education for highly able students. Chinese teachers regarded family education as the main source to extend highly able children’s learning experience. A concern for lacking professional knowledge for properly identifying and addressing the needs of highly able children was revealed between Chinese and Scottish teachers. The findings suggest that teacher training for gifted education and the flexibility for planning differentiated instruction should be provided to teachers in both countries.","PeriodicalId":47755,"journal":{"name":"Educational Review","volume":"41 1","pages":"1150 - 1167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.2001437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study explored regular classroom teachers’ perceptions of highly able readers and their actual practice of gifted education in the educational contexts of China and Scotland. This study is qualitative in nature and questionnaires and interviews were used to gather data in Chinese and Scottish public primary schools. The analysis indicated that many teachers in both countries believed that compared to their similar-aged peers, highly able readers could demonstrate advanced linguistic, cognitive and socioemotional abilities, and additional support was needed to develop reading ability. However, divergence emerged in terms of the role of school education. While Scottish teachers believed that highly able readers could be developed by school education, Chinese teachers believed that the role of school education was to provide basic education rather than enriched and additional education for highly able students. Chinese teachers regarded family education as the main source to extend highly able children’s learning experience. A concern for lacking professional knowledge for properly identifying and addressing the needs of highly able children was revealed between Chinese and Scottish teachers. The findings suggest that teacher training for gifted education and the flexibility for planning differentiated instruction should be provided to teachers in both countries.
期刊介绍:
Educational Review is a leading journal for generic educational research and scholarship. For over seventy years it has offered scholarly analyses of global issues in all phases of education, formal and informal. It publishes peer-reviewed papers from international contributors across a range of education fields and or perspectives including pedagogy and the curriculum, history, philosophy, psychology, sociology, international and comparative education and educational leadership. Articles offer original insights to formal and informal educational policy, provision, processes and practice and the experiences of all those involved in many countries around the world. The editors welcome high quality, original papers which encourage and enhance debate on social justice and critical enquiry in education, besides innovative new theoretical and methodological scholarship. The journal offers six editions a year. The Board invites proposals for special editions as well as commissioning them.