Cultural studies, education, and the apocalyptic threat of war (Vol. 44, No. 2)

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Means, Graham B. Slater
{"title":"Cultural studies, education, and the apocalyptic threat of war (Vol. 44, No. 2)","authors":"A. Means, Graham B. Slater","doi":"10.1080/10714413.2022.2066385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The influence of militarism and war on education has long been a significant concern for Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies (REPCS), especially in the aftermath of the events of September 11, 2001, which saw waning Cold War imperial imaginaries revivified and repurposed for the “war on terror.” During the two decades since 9/11, a militarized culture has infiltrated education, not only through formal schooling, but bellicose public pedagogies as well. As Henry Giroux, former editor-inchief of REPCS, has illuminated at length in his work, there is a fundamental contradiction between war and militarism, on one hand, and democratic life, on the other. Given the journal’s historical role in publishing critical scholarship concerned with the relationship between militarism, war, and education, we take the editorial stance that understanding the role of education in struggles over war and peace, imperialism and militarism, and the global prospect of democracy, equality, and justice, is crucial for cultural studies. Beyond Giroux’s extensive work on the matter, REPCS authors have addressed the important intersections of many related topics, including the gendered implications of militarism, such as the role of masculinity in its expansion, as well as the fundamental threat militarism poses to women (Armato et al., 2013; Goodman, 2010; Hammer, 2003; Kellner, 2013); the impact of militarism on universities, schools, and youth (Armitage, 2005; Lewis, 2003); the integration of militarism and war with education policy and reform movements (Mookerjea, 2009; Nguyen, 2013; Saltman, 2006; Tamatea, 2008); and the manner in which war and militarism degrade academic freedom, higher education, and university cultures (Ivie, 2005; Ternes, 2016). There is little to suggest that the relevance of such concerns has decreased in any significant way. In fact, there have been historical developments, such as deepening crises of global capitalism, rising geopolitical conflicts, resurgent authoritarianism, further ecological ruin, and nuclear proliferation that, we would argue, heighten the stakes and the need for scholarship that addresses militarized culture, education, and the catastrophic dangers of war in our time. Moreover, education and pedagogy remain central to building capacities to understand these developments and to foster opposition to perpetual war and the existential threat it poses today. It is no coincidence that we write this editorial just over a month into the horrific Russian invasion of Ukraine, a mid-sized country, but with no fewer than fifteen nuclear reactors, all of which are vulnerable to military incursion and indiscriminate bombing. There have been reports of fires at nuclear facilities, such as at the Chernobyl and Zaporizhzhia plants. Russia has also put its nuclear forces on alert and has made the use of tactical nuclear weapons part of its military doctrine. Cities have been leveled. Millions have already been displaced, maimed, or killed. Agriculture has","PeriodicalId":45129,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2022.2066385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The influence of militarism and war on education has long been a significant concern for Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies (REPCS), especially in the aftermath of the events of September 11, 2001, which saw waning Cold War imperial imaginaries revivified and repurposed for the “war on terror.” During the two decades since 9/11, a militarized culture has infiltrated education, not only through formal schooling, but bellicose public pedagogies as well. As Henry Giroux, former editor-inchief of REPCS, has illuminated at length in his work, there is a fundamental contradiction between war and militarism, on one hand, and democratic life, on the other. Given the journal’s historical role in publishing critical scholarship concerned with the relationship between militarism, war, and education, we take the editorial stance that understanding the role of education in struggles over war and peace, imperialism and militarism, and the global prospect of democracy, equality, and justice, is crucial for cultural studies. Beyond Giroux’s extensive work on the matter, REPCS authors have addressed the important intersections of many related topics, including the gendered implications of militarism, such as the role of masculinity in its expansion, as well as the fundamental threat militarism poses to women (Armato et al., 2013; Goodman, 2010; Hammer, 2003; Kellner, 2013); the impact of militarism on universities, schools, and youth (Armitage, 2005; Lewis, 2003); the integration of militarism and war with education policy and reform movements (Mookerjea, 2009; Nguyen, 2013; Saltman, 2006; Tamatea, 2008); and the manner in which war and militarism degrade academic freedom, higher education, and university cultures (Ivie, 2005; Ternes, 2016). There is little to suggest that the relevance of such concerns has decreased in any significant way. In fact, there have been historical developments, such as deepening crises of global capitalism, rising geopolitical conflicts, resurgent authoritarianism, further ecological ruin, and nuclear proliferation that, we would argue, heighten the stakes and the need for scholarship that addresses militarized culture, education, and the catastrophic dangers of war in our time. Moreover, education and pedagogy remain central to building capacities to understand these developments and to foster opposition to perpetual war and the existential threat it poses today. It is no coincidence that we write this editorial just over a month into the horrific Russian invasion of Ukraine, a mid-sized country, but with no fewer than fifteen nuclear reactors, all of which are vulnerable to military incursion and indiscriminate bombing. There have been reports of fires at nuclear facilities, such as at the Chernobyl and Zaporizhzhia plants. Russia has also put its nuclear forces on alert and has made the use of tactical nuclear weapons part of its military doctrine. Cities have been leveled. Millions have already been displaced, maimed, or killed. Agriculture has
文化研究、教育和战争的末日威胁(第44卷第2期)
长期以来,军国主义和战争对教育的影响一直是《教育、教育学与文化研究评论》(REPCS)关注的一个重要问题,尤其是在2001年9月11日事件之后,人们看到冷战帝国的幻想重新复苏,并被重新定位为“反恐战争”。自9/11以来的二十年里,军事化文化渗透到教育中,不仅通过正规学校,而且通过好战的公共教育方式。正如《REPCS》前主编亨利·吉鲁在他的著作中详细阐述的那样,在战争和军国主义与民主生活之间存在着根本的矛盾。鉴于该杂志在发表有关军国主义、战争和教育之间关系的批判性学术研究方面的历史作用,我们的编辑立场是,了解教育在战争与和平、帝国主义与军国主义以及全球民主、平等和正义前景的斗争中的作用,对文化研究至关重要。除了吉鲁在这个问题上的广泛工作之外,REPCS的作者们还讨论了许多相关主题的重要交叉点,包括军国主义的性别含义,比如男性气质在其扩张中的作用,以及军国主义对女性构成的根本威胁(armatto等人,2013;古德曼,2010;锤,2003;科尔纳,2013);军国主义对大学、学校和青年的影响(阿米蒂奇,2005;刘易斯,2003);军国主义和战争与教育政策和改革运动的整合(Mookerjea, 2009;阮,2013;索特曼,2006;Tamatea, 2008);以及战争和军国主义削弱学术自由、高等教育和大学文化的方式(Ivie, 2005;燕鸥,2016)。几乎没有迹象表明,这些担忧的相关性已经显著下降。事实上,我们认为,全球资本主义危机的加深、地缘政治冲突的加剧、威权主义的复兴、生态破坏的进一步加剧以及核扩散等历史发展,都加大了对研究军事化文化、教育和我们这个时代战争灾难性危险的学术的风险和需求。此外,教育和教育学仍然是建设能力的核心,以理解这些发展,并促进反对永久战争及其今天构成的生存威胁。这篇社论是在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的一个多月后写的,这并非巧合。乌克兰是一个中等规模的国家,但拥有不少于十五个核反应堆,所有这些反应堆都很容易受到军事入侵和滥杀滥伤的轰炸。有报道称核设施发生了火灾,比如切尔诺贝利核电站和其他核电站。俄罗斯也将其核力量置于警戒状态,并将战术核武器的使用纳入其军事学说。城市被夷为平地。数百万人已经流离失所,致残或死亡。农业
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies
Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信