A microbial survey of food service can openers, food and beverage can tops and cleaning methodology effectiveness

Barry Michaels, Vidhya Gangar, Ann Schultz, Michael S. Curiale
{"title":"A microbial survey of food service can openers, food and beverage can tops and cleaning methodology effectiveness","authors":"Barry Michaels,&nbsp;Vidhya Gangar,&nbsp;Ann Schultz,&nbsp;Michael S. Curiale","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-5740.2003.00072.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A can opener and food/beverage can top survey was undertaken to identify potential microbiological hazards. Results indicated the potential for high levels of bacterial and fungal contamination. Characterization of microorganisms from 10 can openers indicated the most common contaminants as <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> and a variety of <i>Staphylococcus</i> and spore-forming <i>Bacillus</i> species. In contrast to previous commercial food service surveys, no <i>Escherichia coli</i> or <i>Salmonella</i> species were found on the cans or can openers, however, low numbers of <i>Bacillus cereus</i> (22 of 25 cans) and <i>Clostridium perfringens</i> (15 of 25 cans) were identified. The effectiveness of various can-cleaning methods was evaluated using marker bacteria (<i>Serratia marcescens</i>) suspended in soil consisting of tryptone soya broth, ground beef or vacuum cleaner dust. In addition to rinsing under running water, two paper towel types and a paper napkin product were used for wiping, moist wiping and wiping after rinsing. The most effective cleaning method was rinsing and wiping combined (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.0003), while wiping alone was not as effective as moist wiping (<i>P</i> = 0.038) or rinsing with water (<i>P</i> = 0.061). Food cans were more easily cleaned than beverage cans because of the tab area. Soil type influenced the degree of effectiveness of the cleaning methods, with mean log<sub>10</sub> reduction values for each type at 3.4 and 3.1 for food and beverage cans (tab area excluded), respectively. No significant difference was observed in the effectiveness of paper products (<i>P</i> = 0.433).</p>","PeriodicalId":100547,"journal":{"name":"Food Service Technology","volume":"3 3-4","pages":"123-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1471-5740.2003.00072.x","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Service Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-5740.2003.00072.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

A can opener and food/beverage can top survey was undertaken to identify potential microbiological hazards. Results indicated the potential for high levels of bacterial and fungal contamination. Characterization of microorganisms from 10 can openers indicated the most common contaminants as Klebsiella pneumoniae and a variety of Staphylococcus and spore-forming Bacillus species. In contrast to previous commercial food service surveys, no Escherichia coli or Salmonella species were found on the cans or can openers, however, low numbers of Bacillus cereus (22 of 25 cans) and Clostridium perfringens (15 of 25 cans) were identified. The effectiveness of various can-cleaning methods was evaluated using marker bacteria (Serratia marcescens) suspended in soil consisting of tryptone soya broth, ground beef or vacuum cleaner dust. In addition to rinsing under running water, two paper towel types and a paper napkin product were used for wiping, moist wiping and wiping after rinsing. The most effective cleaning method was rinsing and wiping combined (P < 0.0003), while wiping alone was not as effective as moist wiping (P = 0.038) or rinsing with water (P = 0.061). Food cans were more easily cleaned than beverage cans because of the tab area. Soil type influenced the degree of effectiveness of the cleaning methods, with mean log10 reduction values for each type at 3.4 and 3.1 for food and beverage cans (tab area excluded), respectively. No significant difference was observed in the effectiveness of paper products (P = 0.433).

食品服务开罐器的微生物调查,食品和饮料罐头顶部和清洁方法的有效性
进行了开罐器和食品/饮料罐顶部调查,以确定潜在的微生物危害。结果表明可能存在高水平的细菌和真菌污染。对10个开罐器的微生物特征分析表明,最常见的污染物是肺炎克雷伯菌和多种葡萄球菌和芽孢杆菌。与以前的商业食品服务调查相比,在罐头或开罐器上没有发现大肠杆菌或沙门氏菌,但鉴定出少量蜡样芽孢杆菌(25个罐头中的22个)和产气荚膜梭菌(25个罐头中的15个)。利用悬浮在由色氨酸豆汤、碎牛肉或真空吸尘器灰尘组成的土壤中的标记菌(粘质沙雷氏菌),评价了各种罐头清洗方法的有效性。除在流水下冲洗外,还使用两种纸巾类型和一种纸巾产品进行擦拭,湿擦拭和冲洗后擦拭。清洗效果最好的方法是冲洗和擦拭(P < 0.0003),而单独擦拭的效果不如湿擦拭(P = 0.038)和清水冲洗(P = 0.061)。食品罐比饮料罐更容易清洗,因为有标签区域。土壤类型影响清洁方法的有效性程度,每种类型的平均log10减少值分别为3.4和3.1,食品和饮料罐(不包括标签区域)。纸制品的有效性差异无统计学意义(P = 0.433)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信