Analyzing Disproportionate Representation in Gifted Education: Identification Procedures, Proximal Causes, Distal Causes, and Theoretical Causes

IF 3 3区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Gifted Child Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-01-03 DOI:10.1177/00169862211037943

Russell T Warne

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Peters (2021) presented an analysis of disproportionate representation of demographic groups in gifted education programs. He views disproportionate representation as a consequence of inequalities that originate outside of gifted education and says that narrowly focusing on gifted education practices will be inadequate for remedying the inequities in the field. Peters’ analysis has four levels of increasing generality: local gifted education practices, proximal causes, distal causes, and theoretical causes. Unfortunately, Peters’ argument grows increasingly shaky as its generality increases.

查看原文本刊更多论文

资优教育中不成比例的代表性分析:鉴定程序、近因、远因及理论原因

Peters(2021)对资优教育项目中人口群体的不成比例代表性进行了分析。他认为，不成比例的代表性是源于天才教育之外的不平等的结果，并表示，狭隘地关注天才教育实践将不足以弥补该领域的不平等。彼得斯的分析有四个层次:地方资优教育实践、近端原因、远端原因和理论原因。不幸的是，彼得斯的论点随着其普遍性的增加而变得越来越不可靠。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Gifted Child Quarterly Multiple-

CiteScore

6.30

自引率

29.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Gifted Child Quarterly (GCQ) is the official journal of the National Association for Gifted Children. As a leading journal in the field, GCQ publishes original scholarly reviews of the literature and quantitative or qualitative research studies. GCQ welcomes manuscripts offering new or creative insights about giftedness and talent development in the context of the school, the home, and the wider society. Manuscripts that explore policy and policy implications are also welcome. Additionally, GCQ reviews selected books relevant to the field, with an emphasis on scholarly texts or text with policy implications, and publishes reviews, essay reviews, and critiques.