SOME THOUGHTS ON CORPUS AND GENERAL LINGUISTICS

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Kopotev
{"title":"SOME THOUGHTS ON CORPUS AND GENERAL LINGUISTICS","authors":"M. Kopotev","doi":"10.51762/1fk-2021-26-02-07.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to a discussion of dominant approaches developed within the framework of Corpus Linguistics (CL) and their influence on the general theory of language. Based on the research co-authored with his colleagues, the author describes three approaches to linguistic research in CL. First, corpus-informed analysis assumes that the data collected in the corpus are used as a source of examples in a natural language. Second, corpus-based analysis presupposes that the data are examined not only qualitatively but also quantitatively. Third, corpus-driven analysis assumes that the research task is to create an algorithm for data processing, the results of which require theoretical interpretation or practical application. The article concludes with a discussion of those implications that CL brings into the general understanding of language. The most important of them are: reduction of the role of introspection, increase of attention to peripheral linguistic phenomena, and reliance on quantitative data. It is still too early to sum up the impact of corpus linguistics on the general theory of language, but it is already clear that syntagmatic connections, in particular idiomatization in a broad sense, have moved into the focus of linguistic attention and are recognized as one of the main phenomena of language and its evolution. Moreover, an adequate description of a language is not limited to the rules of interaction of units divided into levels, but the description of all – both individual and the most general – probabilistic parameters of use, representing a single continuum in which the division into language and speech is conventional.","PeriodicalId":40343,"journal":{"name":"Philological Class","volume":"70 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philological Class","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51762/1fk-2021-26-02-07.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to a discussion of dominant approaches developed within the framework of Corpus Linguistics (CL) and their influence on the general theory of language. Based on the research co-authored with his colleagues, the author describes three approaches to linguistic research in CL. First, corpus-informed analysis assumes that the data collected in the corpus are used as a source of examples in a natural language. Second, corpus-based analysis presupposes that the data are examined not only qualitatively but also quantitatively. Third, corpus-driven analysis assumes that the research task is to create an algorithm for data processing, the results of which require theoretical interpretation or practical application. The article concludes with a discussion of those implications that CL brings into the general understanding of language. The most important of them are: reduction of the role of introspection, increase of attention to peripheral linguistic phenomena, and reliance on quantitative data. It is still too early to sum up the impact of corpus linguistics on the general theory of language, but it is already clear that syntagmatic connections, in particular idiomatization in a broad sense, have moved into the focus of linguistic attention and are recognized as one of the main phenomena of language and its evolution. Moreover, an adequate description of a language is not limited to the rules of interaction of units divided into levels, but the description of all – both individual and the most general – probabilistic parameters of use, representing a single continuum in which the division into language and speech is conventional.
关于语料库与普通语言学的几点思考
本文讨论了语料库语言学(CL)框架内发展起来的主要研究方法及其对语言一般理论的影响。作者根据与同事共同撰写的研究,描述了语言学研究的三种方法。首先,基于语料库的分析假设语料库中收集的数据被用作自然语言中的示例来源。其次,基于语料库的分析假设数据不仅要进行定性检查,还要进行定量检查。第三,语料库驱动分析假设研究任务是创建一种数据处理算法,其结果需要理论解释或实际应用。文章最后讨论了语言学习对一般语言理解的影响。其中最重要的是:减少内省的作用,增加对外围语言现象的关注,以及依赖定量数据。总结语料库语言学对一般语言理论的影响还为时过早,但可以明确的是,组合连接,特别是广义的习语化,已经成为语言学关注的焦点,并被认为是语言及其进化的主要现象之一。此外,对一种语言的充分描述不局限于划分为层次的单位的相互作用规则,而是对所有-无论是个人的还是最普遍的-使用的概率参数的描述,代表了一个单一的连续体,在这个连续体中,语言和语音的划分是传统的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philological Class
Philological Class EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书