Exploring the Transformation of Opinion Leaders from a Traditional to a Digital Mindset

IF 0.7 Q4 MANAGEMENT
E. Balcı, Salih Ti̇ryaki̇, Melissa Karakus
{"title":"Exploring the Transformation of Opinion Leaders from a Traditional to a Digital Mindset","authors":"E. Balcı, Salih Ti̇ryaki̇, Melissa Karakus","doi":"10.33844/ijol.2022.60338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advancements in the field of communication concurrently transpire throughout the evolution of the Internet and its accompanying tools. A free communication opportunity over the internet platform has resulted in the involvement of a sizable people mass in this digital environment. Individuals also pose variations in communication styles since Web 2.0 technology promotes interpersonal connection and communication. Such variations have resulted in modification and deformation in the Two-Stage Flow Theory, which is among the traditional communication models. According to the conventional definition, opinion leaders have the force to potentially influence society with their respective approaches and responses to various events and cases. They have revived alongside the changing media contexts. The transition in these platforms proceeds beyond the change in technology since they facilitate a significant portion of social change. Nowadays, opinion leaders appeal to eventuate social change since they have the potential to convey to a sizable mass of internet users. The vast majority of internet users are influenced by the attitudes and accessions of new opinion leaders while making decisions on their social life, political issues, products, and personal investments. On the one hand, people, groups, companies, and political structures that are aware of the indulgent aspects of the opinion leaders try to persuade them; on the other hand, these entities seek to generate their opinion leaders and forge a follower mass for them. The purpose of the study was to assess the concept of an opinion leader introduced by the Two-Stage Flow Theory and the new context in which it has emerged in light of the elaboration of modern communication technology. The study findings revealed that the Internet and its accompanying tools differed the recent opinion leaders from traditional ones; however, the most critical pillar of this differentiation was digital domains where opinion leaders appeal to large masses composed of different layers.","PeriodicalId":43385,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Organizational Leadership","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Organizational Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2022.60338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advancements in the field of communication concurrently transpire throughout the evolution of the Internet and its accompanying tools. A free communication opportunity over the internet platform has resulted in the involvement of a sizable people mass in this digital environment. Individuals also pose variations in communication styles since Web 2.0 technology promotes interpersonal connection and communication. Such variations have resulted in modification and deformation in the Two-Stage Flow Theory, which is among the traditional communication models. According to the conventional definition, opinion leaders have the force to potentially influence society with their respective approaches and responses to various events and cases. They have revived alongside the changing media contexts. The transition in these platforms proceeds beyond the change in technology since they facilitate a significant portion of social change. Nowadays, opinion leaders appeal to eventuate social change since they have the potential to convey to a sizable mass of internet users. The vast majority of internet users are influenced by the attitudes and accessions of new opinion leaders while making decisions on their social life, political issues, products, and personal investments. On the one hand, people, groups, companies, and political structures that are aware of the indulgent aspects of the opinion leaders try to persuade them; on the other hand, these entities seek to generate their opinion leaders and forge a follower mass for them. The purpose of the study was to assess the concept of an opinion leader introduced by the Two-Stage Flow Theory and the new context in which it has emerged in light of the elaboration of modern communication technology. The study findings revealed that the Internet and its accompanying tools differed the recent opinion leaders from traditional ones; however, the most critical pillar of this differentiation was digital domains where opinion leaders appeal to large masses composed of different layers.
探讨意见领袖从传统思维向数字化思维的转变
通信领域的进步同时伴随着互联网及其配套工具的发展。在互联网平台上的自由交流机会导致了在这个数字环境中有相当大的人群的参与。由于Web 2.0技术促进了人与人之间的联系和沟通,因此个人的沟通风格也会发生变化。这些变化导致了传统通信模型中的两阶段流理论的修正和变形。根据传统的定义,意见领袖通过各自对各种事件和案件的方法和反应,具有潜在影响社会的力量。它们随着不断变化的媒体环境而复活。这些平台的转变超越了技术的变化,因为它们促进了社会变革的很大一部分。如今,意见领袖呼吁最终的社会变革,因为他们有潜力向大量的互联网用户传达信息。绝大多数互联网用户在对其社会生活、政治问题、产品和个人投资做出决定时,都会受到新意见领袖的态度和加入的影响。一方面,个人、团体、公司和政治结构意识到意见领袖的放纵方面,试图说服他们;另一方面,这些实体寻求产生他们的意见领袖,并为他们锻造一个追随者群体。本研究的目的是评估两阶段流动理论所提出的意见领袖的概念,以及根据现代通讯技术的发展而出现的新背景。研究结果表明,互联网及其配套工具使当今的意见领袖与传统的意见领袖有所不同;然而,这种分化的最关键支柱是数字领域,在这些领域,意见领袖吸引着由不同阶层组成的广大群众。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
9.10%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信