Yu. M. Lotman and the problems of theoretical literary criticism

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yu. V. Shatin
{"title":"Yu. M. Lotman and the problems of theoretical literary criticism","authors":"Yu. V. Shatin","doi":"10.51762/1fk-2022-27-01-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"concepts of literary theory, which, along with the study of the problems of culture studies and the history of Russian literature, played an extremely important role in philological science. Among the large number of monographs and articles written by the scholar from Tartu, “Lectures on Structural Poetics” (1964) and “Culture and Explosion” (1992) stand out. According to the author of this article, it was in these works that the main break through took place, which put up an end to the rule of dogmatic literary criticism and opened up new opportunities in the field of philology. In particular, in the first book, the concept of structure as an epistemological category was postulated for the first time, in contrast to composition, which represents the material embodiment of the structure in text. In the last study, Lotman largely develops a number of new ideas, in which the text is understood as a field of relationships between systemic and non-systemic elements and suggests the possibility of various options for its development. In “Culture and Explosion”, the scholar presented a set of ideas that largely coincide with the thoughts of European poststructuralists, but differ in the interpretation of the main features of the literary process. K e y w o r d s : structuralism; text structure; rhizome; post-structuralism; literature theory; literary studies spe-","PeriodicalId":40343,"journal":{"name":"Philological Class","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philological Class","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51762/1fk-2022-27-01-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

concepts of literary theory, which, along with the study of the problems of culture studies and the history of Russian literature, played an extremely important role in philological science. Among the large number of monographs and articles written by the scholar from Tartu, “Lectures on Structural Poetics” (1964) and “Culture and Explosion” (1992) stand out. According to the author of this article, it was in these works that the main break through took place, which put up an end to the rule of dogmatic literary criticism and opened up new opportunities in the field of philology. In particular, in the first book, the concept of structure as an epistemological category was postulated for the first time, in contrast to composition, which represents the material embodiment of the structure in text. In the last study, Lotman largely develops a number of new ideas, in which the text is understood as a field of relationships between systemic and non-systemic elements and suggests the possibility of various options for its development. In “Culture and Explosion”, the scholar presented a set of ideas that largely coincide with the thoughts of European poststructuralists, but differ in the interpretation of the main features of the literary process. K e y w o r d s : structuralism; text structure; rhizome; post-structuralism; literature theory; literary studies spe-
余。罗特曼与理论文学批评的问题
它与对文化研究问题和俄罗斯文学史的研究一起,在文献学中发挥了极其重要的作用。在塔尔图学者撰写的大量专著和文章中,《结构诗学讲座》(1964年)和《文化与爆炸》(1992年)最为突出。笔者认为,正是在这些作品中发生了主要的突破,结束了文学批评的教条主义统治,开辟了文献学领域的新机遇。特别是,在第一本书中,结构的概念作为认识论范畴首次被假设,而不是构成,它代表了结构在文本中的物质体现。在最后一项研究中,洛特曼在很大程度上发展了一些新的想法,其中文本被理解为系统和非系统元素之间关系的领域,并提出了其发展的各种选择的可能性。在《文化与爆炸》一书中,这位学者提出了一套与欧洲后结构主义者的思想基本一致的观点,但在对文学过程的主要特征的解释上有所不同。他的理论是:结构主义;文本结构;粉末;后结构主义;文学理论;文学研究专业
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philological Class
Philological Class EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书