Situative approaches to online engagement, assessment, and equity

IF 14.3 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
D. Hickey
{"title":"Situative approaches to online engagement, assessment, and equity","authors":"D. Hickey","doi":"10.1080/00461520.2022.2079129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The articles in this special issue on Improving Online Learning Theory, Research, and Practice characterize online learning using a set of “diverse lenses.” Most of these articles draw primarily from modern socio-constructivist perspectives and applied psychological constructs derived from more basic research. My strong embrace of situated cognition and design-based methods led to questions about how key issues in online learning such as online engagement, summative and formative assessment, and equitable learning were conceptualized. Specifically, I contrast how the socio-constructivist approaches in most of the articles might be re-conceptualized in a situative approach called participatory learning and assessment. I conclude by summarizing the potential value of a deeper embrace of situativity in online learning theory and research.","PeriodicalId":48361,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychologist","volume":"164 1","pages":"221 - 225"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2079129","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The articles in this special issue on Improving Online Learning Theory, Research, and Practice characterize online learning using a set of “diverse lenses.” Most of these articles draw primarily from modern socio-constructivist perspectives and applied psychological constructs derived from more basic research. My strong embrace of situated cognition and design-based methods led to questions about how key issues in online learning such as online engagement, summative and formative assessment, and equitable learning were conceptualized. Specifically, I contrast how the socio-constructivist approaches in most of the articles might be re-conceptualized in a situative approach called participatory learning and assessment. I conclude by summarizing the potential value of a deeper embrace of situativity in online learning theory and research.
在线参与、评估和公平的情境方法
本期《改进在线学习的理论、研究与实践》特刊中的文章用一套“多元视角”来描述在线学习。这些文章大多是从现代社会建构主义的角度出发,并从更基础的研究中得出应用心理结构。我对情境认知和基于设计的方法的强烈支持导致了关于在线学习中的关键问题(如在线参与、总结性和形成性评估以及公平学习)是如何概念化的问题。具体而言,我对比了大多数文章中的社会建构主义方法如何在一种称为参与式学习和评估的情境方法中重新概念化。最后,我总结了在在线学习理论和研究中更深入地拥抱情境性的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Educational Psychologist is a scholarly journal dedicated to exploring the psychology of learning and instruction. Articles in this journal encompass a diverse range of perspectives, from examining psychological mechanisms to exploring social and societal phenomena related to learning and instruction. The journal publishes theoretical and conceptual articles, as well as reviews and meta-analyses, that significantly contribute to theory or advance the methods used to explore educational psychology. Emphasizing innovation and advancing understanding, the journal does not publish articles solely reporting the methods and results of empirical studies; instead, all submissions, including reviews and meta-analyses, must offer clear implications for advancing theory. In addition to regular articles, the journal features special issues that delve into important themes in educational psychology, along with focal articles accompanied by peer commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信