Transitive literary discourse in the modern novel

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
G. Danilina, E. Khromova
{"title":"Transitive literary discourse in the modern novel","authors":"G. Danilina, E. Khromova","doi":"10.51762/1fk-2021-26-04-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abst ract. The novels of W. G. Sebald, Vladimir Vertlib, Alexei Makushinsky, and many other contemporary writers around the world challenge both readers and researchers. These authors tend to have a (trans)migrant background and establish their texts at the intersection of many cultural codes, languages, and sign systems. Literary translingualism and multimodality from particular stylistic techniques are becoming dominant writing strategies for an entire corpus of outstanding fictional texts for which previous analytical approaches become irrelevant. This is new literature that needs to be addressed and discussed in a new way. This article hypothesizes that in such novels, a new – transitive – discursive practice is taking shape. The article presents the concept of transitive literary discourse and reveals some of its common features based on the three translingual novels. These are “Austerlitz” (2001) by W. G. Sebald (Germany – UK), “Way Stations” (1999) by Vladimir Vertlib (Russia – Austria), and “Steamship to Argentina” (2014) by Alexei Makushinsky (Russia – Germany). The authors of the article combine the methods of discourse analysis, historical and theoretical poetics. Mikhail Bakhtin’s works on the aesthetics of verbal creativity provide the methodological basis of the study. The intellectual toolkit of the transnational and visual methodological turns is also engaged. The study reflects a set of topical issues of modern literary theory aimed at understanding the language of literature and art at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries (the era of globalization). Transitive literary texts actualize the problem of the language of description, methodology and analysis technique of a new literary discourse.","PeriodicalId":40343,"journal":{"name":"Philological Class","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philological Class","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51762/1fk-2021-26-04-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abst ract. The novels of W. G. Sebald, Vladimir Vertlib, Alexei Makushinsky, and many other contemporary writers around the world challenge both readers and researchers. These authors tend to have a (trans)migrant background and establish their texts at the intersection of many cultural codes, languages, and sign systems. Literary translingualism and multimodality from particular stylistic techniques are becoming dominant writing strategies for an entire corpus of outstanding fictional texts for which previous analytical approaches become irrelevant. This is new literature that needs to be addressed and discussed in a new way. This article hypothesizes that in such novels, a new – transitive – discursive practice is taking shape. The article presents the concept of transitive literary discourse and reveals some of its common features based on the three translingual novels. These are “Austerlitz” (2001) by W. G. Sebald (Germany – UK), “Way Stations” (1999) by Vladimir Vertlib (Russia – Austria), and “Steamship to Argentina” (2014) by Alexei Makushinsky (Russia – Germany). The authors of the article combine the methods of discourse analysis, historical and theoretical poetics. Mikhail Bakhtin’s works on the aesthetics of verbal creativity provide the methodological basis of the study. The intellectual toolkit of the transnational and visual methodological turns is also engaged. The study reflects a set of topical issues of modern literary theory aimed at understanding the language of literature and art at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries (the era of globalization). Transitive literary texts actualize the problem of the language of description, methodology and analysis technique of a new literary discourse.
现代小说中的及物文学话语
Abst ract。w·g·西博尔德、弗拉基米尔·维特利布、阿列克谢·马库辛斯基以及世界上许多其他当代作家的小说对读者和研究者都提出了挑战。这些作者往往具有(跨性别)移民背景,并在许多文化代码、语言和符号系统的交叉点上建立他们的文本。文学的翻译主义和多模态从特定的文体技巧正在成为主导的写作策略,为整个语料库的杰出小说文本,以前的分析方法变得无关。这是一种新的文学,需要以一种新的方式来解决和讨论。本文认为,在这类小说中,一种新的及物话语实践正在形成。本文提出了及物文学话语的概念,并以这三部英译小说为例,揭示了及物文学话语的一些共同特征。这些作品分别是w·g·塞巴尔德(德国-英国)的《奥斯特里茨》(2001)、弗拉基米尔·维特利布(俄罗斯-奥地利)的《驿站》(1999)和阿列克谢·马库辛斯基(俄罗斯-德国)的《开往阿根廷的汽船》(2014)。本文作者将话语分析、历史诗学和理论诗学相结合。巴赫金关于言语创造美学的著作为这一研究提供了方法论基础。跨国的和视觉的方法论转向的知识工具箱也参与其中。该研究反映了一系列现代文学理论的主题问题,旨在理解20世纪和21世纪(全球化时代)的文学和艺术语言。及物文学文本实现了一种新的文学话语的描述语言、方法论和分析技术问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philological Class
Philological Class EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书