Challenging research norms in educational psychology

IF 14.3 1区心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Educational Psychologist Pub Date : 2020-09-08 DOI:10.1080/00461520.2020.1810043

S. B. Nolen

引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract In this commentary, I identify some common themes in the six articles in this special issue, including the importance of aligning research methods with research questions and embracing the complexity of educational phenomena. Then, I reflect on some differences in how authors responded to the request to discuss the role of their inquiry world view and their own take on the meaning of equity in research. Finally, I offer a few reflections on the state of methodology in educational psychology.

查看原文本刊更多论文

挑战教育心理学的研究规范

在这篇评论中，我在本期特刊的六篇文章中确定了一些共同的主题，包括将研究方法与研究问题结合起来的重要性，以及接受教育现象的复杂性。然后，我反思了作者如何回应讨论他们的探究世界观的作用和他们自己对研究中公平意义的看法的一些差异。最后，对教育心理学方法论的现状提出几点思考。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Educational Psychologist Multiple-

CiteScore

19.10

自引率

3.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Educational Psychologist is a scholarly journal dedicated to exploring the psychology of learning and instruction. Articles in this journal encompass a diverse range of perspectives, from examining psychological mechanisms to exploring social and societal phenomena related to learning and instruction. The journal publishes theoretical and conceptual articles, as well as reviews and meta-analyses, that significantly contribute to theory or advance the methods used to explore educational psychology. Emphasizing innovation and advancing understanding, the journal does not publish articles solely reporting the methods and results of empirical studies; instead, all submissions, including reviews and meta-analyses, must offer clear implications for advancing theory. In addition to regular articles, the journal features special issues that delve into important themes in educational psychology, along with focal articles accompanied by peer commentary.