Efficacy of video-based teacher professional development for increasing classroom discourse and student learning

IF 3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Gaowei Chen, Carol K. K. Chan, K. Chan, S. Clarke, L. Resnick
{"title":"Efficacy of video-based teacher professional development for increasing classroom discourse and student learning","authors":"Gaowei Chen, Carol K. K. Chan, K. Chan, S. Clarke, L. Resnick","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2020.1783269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Although professional development (PD) programs often use video, extraneous information during video viewing can distract teachers. We developed a discourse visualization tool, the Classroom Discourse Analyzer (CDA), to support teachers’ reflections on classroom discourse in video-based PD workshops. Methods We used a randomized controlled trial with an embedded case study to examine the efficacy of a year-long video-based PD program using the CDA. Findings The 24 intervention teachers significantly increased their use of productive talk moves in mathematics classrooms relative to the 22 comparison teachers (Cohen’s d = 0.67 to 2.35, p <.05). Moreover, a linear mixed model analysis showed that 882 students of the intervention teachers had significantly higher mathematics achievement scores than the 625 comparison students (Cohen’s d = 0.24, p <.05). The case study showed that CDA’s multiple representations of classroom discourse and interactive, process-oriented visualizations facilitated the teachers’ navigation of classroom video data. Additionally, video and visualizations prompted the teachers to reflect on the data with their peers for evidence-based reasoning and discussion. Contribution This study demonstrates the efficacy of a video-based PD program for increasing classroom discourse and student learning. It also informs the design of visualizations to enrich video-based PD.","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":"66 1","pages":"642 - 680"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1783269","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Although professional development (PD) programs often use video, extraneous information during video viewing can distract teachers. We developed a discourse visualization tool, the Classroom Discourse Analyzer (CDA), to support teachers’ reflections on classroom discourse in video-based PD workshops. Methods We used a randomized controlled trial with an embedded case study to examine the efficacy of a year-long video-based PD program using the CDA. Findings The 24 intervention teachers significantly increased their use of productive talk moves in mathematics classrooms relative to the 22 comparison teachers (Cohen’s d = 0.67 to 2.35, p <.05). Moreover, a linear mixed model analysis showed that 882 students of the intervention teachers had significantly higher mathematics achievement scores than the 625 comparison students (Cohen’s d = 0.24, p <.05). The case study showed that CDA’s multiple representations of classroom discourse and interactive, process-oriented visualizations facilitated the teachers’ navigation of classroom video data. Additionally, video and visualizations prompted the teachers to reflect on the data with their peers for evidence-based reasoning and discussion. Contribution This study demonstrates the efficacy of a video-based PD program for increasing classroom discourse and student learning. It also informs the design of visualizations to enrich video-based PD.
基于视频的教师专业发展对提高课堂话语和学生学习的效果
虽然专业发展(PD)课程经常使用视频,但视频观看过程中的无关信息会分散教师的注意力。我们开发了一个话语可视化工具,课堂话语分析器(CDA),以支持教师在基于视频的PD研讨会中对课堂话语的思考。方法:我们采用一项随机对照试验和嵌入式案例研究来检查使用CDA进行为期一年的基于视频的PD计划的效果。结果24名干预教师与22名对照教师相比,在数学课堂上显著增加了生产性谈话动作的使用(Cohen’s d = 0.67 ~ 2.35, p < 0.05)。此外,线性混合模型分析显示,干预教师的882名学生的数学成就得分显著高于对照组的625名学生(Cohen’s d = 0.24, p < 0.05)。案例研究表明,批评性话语分析对课堂话语的多重表征和交互式的、面向过程的可视化,有助于教师对课堂视频数据的导航。此外,视频和可视化促使教师与同行一起反思数据,进行基于证据的推理和讨论。本研究证明了以视频为基础的PD计划对增加课堂话语和学生学习的有效性。它还告知可视化的设计,以丰富基于视频的PD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Journal of the Learning Sciences (JLS) is one of the two official journals of the International Society of the Learning Sciences ( www.isls.org). JLS provides a multidisciplinary forum for research on education and learning that informs theories of how people learn and the design of learning environments. It publishes research that elucidates processes of learning, and the ways in which technologies, instructional practices, and learning environments can be designed to support learning in different contexts. JLS articles draw on theoretical frameworks from such diverse fields as cognitive science, sociocultural theory, educational psychology, computer science, and anthropology. Submissions are not limited to any particular research method, but must be based on rigorous analyses that present new insights into how people learn and/or how learning can be supported and enhanced. Successful submissions should position their argument within extant literature in the learning sciences. They should reflect the core practices and foci that have defined the learning sciences as a field: privileging design in methodology and pedagogy; emphasizing interdisciplinarity and methodological innovation; grounding research in real-world contexts; answering questions about learning process and mechanism, alongside outcomes; pursuing technological and pedagogical innovation; and maintaining a strong connection between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信