Invoking student resources in whole-class conversations in science education: A sociocultural perspective

IF 3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Furberg, Kenneth Silseth
{"title":"Invoking student resources in whole-class conversations in science education: A sociocultural perspective","authors":"A. Furberg, Kenneth Silseth","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2021.1954521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background While much literature has argued for the value of carefully designed instructional units building on student resources, less work details how students’ own invocation of experiences and ideas from their everyday lives plays out in naturalistic classroom dialogues. Employing a sociocultural and interactional approach, this article illuminates how student resources become mediational means in ways that support learning. Methods The empirical basis constitutes whole-class conversations involving lower secondary school students and their teacher during a science project about genetics. The applied analytical procedure involves microanalyses of sequences of student–teacher interaction in settings where students invoke resources from their everyday lives. Findings The findings demonstrate that student resources became mediational means that (a) enabled students to express and test out their conceptual understanding and scientific reasoning, (b) promoted student participation and curiosity, and (c) positioned students as authoritative and accountable participants in whole-class conversations. Furthermore, how student resources became mediational means was also dependent on the distribution of authoritative roles between students and the teacher. Contributions This article provides evidence for the value of invoking student resources in educational dialogues and displays both how they can support learning and the challenges teachers may face in doing so.","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":"6 1","pages":"278 - 316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1954521","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background While much literature has argued for the value of carefully designed instructional units building on student resources, less work details how students’ own invocation of experiences and ideas from their everyday lives plays out in naturalistic classroom dialogues. Employing a sociocultural and interactional approach, this article illuminates how student resources become mediational means in ways that support learning. Methods The empirical basis constitutes whole-class conversations involving lower secondary school students and their teacher during a science project about genetics. The applied analytical procedure involves microanalyses of sequences of student–teacher interaction in settings where students invoke resources from their everyday lives. Findings The findings demonstrate that student resources became mediational means that (a) enabled students to express and test out their conceptual understanding and scientific reasoning, (b) promoted student participation and curiosity, and (c) positioned students as authoritative and accountable participants in whole-class conversations. Furthermore, how student resources became mediational means was also dependent on the distribution of authoritative roles between students and the teacher. Contributions This article provides evidence for the value of invoking student resources in educational dialogues and displays both how they can support learning and the challenges teachers may face in doing so.
在科学教育的课堂对话中调用学生资源:一个社会文化的视角
虽然许多文献都认为精心设计的教学单元建立在学生资源的基础上的价值,但很少有研究详细说明学生如何从日常生活中调用自己的经验和想法,在自然主义的课堂对话中发挥作用。本文采用社会文化和互动的方法,阐明了学生资源如何成为支持学习的中介手段。方法以初中学生与教师在遗传学科学项目中的课堂对话为实证基础。应用分析程序包括在学生从日常生活中调用资源的环境中对师生互动序列进行微观分析。研究结果表明,学生资源成为中介手段(a)使学生能够表达和测试他们的概念理解和科学推理,(b)促进学生的参与和好奇心,以及(c)将学生定位为全班对话的权威和负责任的参与者。此外,学生资源如何成为中介手段也取决于学生与教师之间权威角色的分配。本文为在教育对话中调用学生资源的价值提供了证据,并展示了他们如何支持学习以及教师在这样做时可能面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Journal of the Learning Sciences (JLS) is one of the two official journals of the International Society of the Learning Sciences ( www.isls.org). JLS provides a multidisciplinary forum for research on education and learning that informs theories of how people learn and the design of learning environments. It publishes research that elucidates processes of learning, and the ways in which technologies, instructional practices, and learning environments can be designed to support learning in different contexts. JLS articles draw on theoretical frameworks from such diverse fields as cognitive science, sociocultural theory, educational psychology, computer science, and anthropology. Submissions are not limited to any particular research method, but must be based on rigorous analyses that present new insights into how people learn and/or how learning can be supported and enhanced. Successful submissions should position their argument within extant literature in the learning sciences. They should reflect the core practices and foci that have defined the learning sciences as a field: privileging design in methodology and pedagogy; emphasizing interdisciplinarity and methodological innovation; grounding research in real-world contexts; answering questions about learning process and mechanism, alongside outcomes; pursuing technological and pedagogical innovation; and maintaining a strong connection between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信