Clicker Interventions at University Lectures and the Feedback Gap

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
K. Egelandsdal, R. Krumsvik
{"title":"Clicker Interventions at University Lectures and the Feedback Gap","authors":"K. Egelandsdal, R. Krumsvik","doi":"10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2019-01-02-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents a mixed methods study on clicker interventions conducted in collaboration with four philosophy teachers at fourteen university lectures. The aim was to examine how feedback from the interventions were received and used by teachers and students. The data material comprises a quasi-experiment based on 6,772 student responses, student logs, a student survey and semi-structured interviews with the teachers. Findings show that students experience feedback that supports their self-monitoring and understanding of the content, and that the peer discussions enhanced student performance. The teachers also experienced an increased awareness of the students’ understanding of the topics. Yet, the findings indicate a gap between the reception and use of the feedback.","PeriodicalId":44945,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy","volume":"51 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2019-01-02-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The article presents a mixed methods study on clicker interventions conducted in collaboration with four philosophy teachers at fourteen university lectures. The aim was to examine how feedback from the interventions were received and used by teachers and students. The data material comprises a quasi-experiment based on 6,772 student responses, student logs, a student survey and semi-structured interviews with the teachers. Findings show that students experience feedback that supports their self-monitoring and understanding of the content, and that the peer discussions enhanced student performance. The teachers also experienced an increased awareness of the students’ understanding of the topics. Yet, the findings indicate a gap between the reception and use of the feedback.
大学讲座中的点击干预与反馈差距
本文以四名哲学教师为研究对象,在十四所大学的讲座中进行了一项关于点击器干预的混合方法研究。目的是检查来自干预的反馈是如何被教师和学生接受和使用的。数据材料包括基于6772名学生回答的准实验、学生日志、学生调查和对教师的半结构化访谈。研究结果表明,学生体验到的反馈支持了他们的自我监控和对内容的理解,并且同伴讨论提高了学生的表现。老师们也意识到学生对主题的理解有所提高。然而,调查结果表明,在接收和使用反馈之间存在差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy
Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信