Learning in and for collective action

IF 3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Joe Curnow, A. S. Jurow
{"title":"Learning in and for collective action","authors":"Joe Curnow, A. S. Jurow","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2021.1880189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collective action matters: out in the streets around us where people are reshaping the world through powerful protests. We see the significance and impact of collective action in uprisings around the world to contest racialized violence, to abolish police and prisons, to demand climate action, and to unequivocally assert that Black Lives Matter. Hong Kong student activists have innovated new technological and organizational tactics that protestors in other countries are using to develop their own anti-government actions. Chilean activists have mobilized massive protests against neoliberal policies and for significant political reform. In these cases, learning is taking place in contentious practice as people strive to transform power relations. Activists are organizing new forms of learning, new identity pathways, and transforming community values and ethics. They are doing this work through complex, volatile, and distributed collective action to shift the tactics, the framing, the recruitment, and the political imagination of social movements. Social movements, defined simply, are “collectivities acting with some degree of organization and continuity, partly outside institutional or organizational channels” that offer a vibrant way of challenging . . . or resisting change in such systems” (Snow & Soule, 2010, pp. 6–7). Social movements have led social change for justice, have inspired actions across communities working in solidarity with each other, and have suffered dramatic losses in the face of oppressive and divisive politics (Baldwin, 1972/2007; Garza, 2020). This special issue is a call to Learning Sciences scholars to study social movements as productive sites where people work together to critique, re-imagine, strategize, design, and re-make how we can engage with one another now and in the future. Learning in these dynamic spaces is understood as possibility, as shaped by relational, spatial, and natural structures and as improvised in and around structures as resources for creative resistance and","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":"63 1","pages":"14 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1880189","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Collective action matters: out in the streets around us where people are reshaping the world through powerful protests. We see the significance and impact of collective action in uprisings around the world to contest racialized violence, to abolish police and prisons, to demand climate action, and to unequivocally assert that Black Lives Matter. Hong Kong student activists have innovated new technological and organizational tactics that protestors in other countries are using to develop their own anti-government actions. Chilean activists have mobilized massive protests against neoliberal policies and for significant political reform. In these cases, learning is taking place in contentious practice as people strive to transform power relations. Activists are organizing new forms of learning, new identity pathways, and transforming community values and ethics. They are doing this work through complex, volatile, and distributed collective action to shift the tactics, the framing, the recruitment, and the political imagination of social movements. Social movements, defined simply, are “collectivities acting with some degree of organization and continuity, partly outside institutional or organizational channels” that offer a vibrant way of challenging . . . or resisting change in such systems” (Snow & Soule, 2010, pp. 6–7). Social movements have led social change for justice, have inspired actions across communities working in solidarity with each other, and have suffered dramatic losses in the face of oppressive and divisive politics (Baldwin, 1972/2007; Garza, 2020). This special issue is a call to Learning Sciences scholars to study social movements as productive sites where people work together to critique, re-imagine, strategize, design, and re-make how we can engage with one another now and in the future. Learning in these dynamic spaces is understood as possibility, as shaped by relational, spatial, and natural structures and as improvised in and around structures as resources for creative resistance and
在集体行动中学习
集体行动很重要:在我们周围的街道上,人们正在通过强大的抗议活动重塑世界。我们看到了集体行动在世界各地反抗种族暴力、废除警察和监狱、要求采取气候行动以及毫不含糊地宣称“黑人的生命也很重要”的起义中的重要性和影响。香港学生活动人士创新了新的技术和组织策略,其他国家的抗议者正在使用这些技术和组织策略来发展自己的反政府行动。智利活动人士动员了大规模的抗议活动,反对新自由主义政策,要求进行重大的政治改革。在这些案例中,学习是在有争议的实践中进行的,因为人们努力改变权力关系。积极分子正在组织新的学习形式,新的身份认同途径,并改变社区价值观和道德规范。他们通过复杂的、不稳定的、分散的集体行动来改变社会运动的策略、框架、招募和政治想象。简单地说,社会运动是“具有某种程度的组织性和连续性的集体行动,部分地在体制或组织渠道之外”,提供了一种充满活力的挑战方式……或抵制这种系统的变化”(Snow & Soule, 2010, pp. 6-7)。社会运动引领了正义的社会变革,激发了社区间团结一致的行动,并在面对压迫和分裂的政治时遭受了巨大的损失(Baldwin, 1972/2007;加尔萨,2020)。本期特刊呼吁学习科学的学者们把社会运动作为一个富有成效的场所来研究,在这里,人们一起批评、重新想象、制定战略、设计和重新制定我们现在和未来如何相互接触。在这些动态空间中的学习被理解为一种可能性,被关系、空间和自然结构所塑造,并在结构内部和周围即兴发挥,作为创造性抵抗和创造力的资源
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Journal of the Learning Sciences (JLS) is one of the two official journals of the International Society of the Learning Sciences ( www.isls.org). JLS provides a multidisciplinary forum for research on education and learning that informs theories of how people learn and the design of learning environments. It publishes research that elucidates processes of learning, and the ways in which technologies, instructional practices, and learning environments can be designed to support learning in different contexts. JLS articles draw on theoretical frameworks from such diverse fields as cognitive science, sociocultural theory, educational psychology, computer science, and anthropology. Submissions are not limited to any particular research method, but must be based on rigorous analyses that present new insights into how people learn and/or how learning can be supported and enhanced. Successful submissions should position their argument within extant literature in the learning sciences. They should reflect the core practices and foci that have defined the learning sciences as a field: privileging design in methodology and pedagogy; emphasizing interdisciplinarity and methodological innovation; grounding research in real-world contexts; answering questions about learning process and mechanism, alongside outcomes; pursuing technological and pedagogical innovation; and maintaining a strong connection between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信