EMOTION DETECTION AND SEMANTICS OF EMOTIVES: DISTRESS AND ANGER IN ANNOTATED TEXT DATASET

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Kolmogorova
{"title":"EMOTION DETECTION AND SEMANTICS OF EMOTIVES: DISTRESS AND ANGER IN ANNOTATED TEXT DATASET","authors":"A. Kolmogorova","doi":"10.51762/1fk-2021-26-02-06.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article explores the ways of making emotional lexemes semantic description consistent with interpretative intuition of the ordinary language speaker. The research novelty is determined by the fact that it is based on the data retrieved from the emotional assessment of 3920 internet-texts in Russian made by informants via using a specially designed computer interface. When applied this interface, we can aggregate the weight of 8 emotions (distress, enjoyment, anger, surprise, shame, excitement, disgust, fear) in text. Thus, the data we have used for this publication includes two sets of 150 internet-texts assessed by 2000 informants with the highest score of emotions of distress or anger. The scope of the study covers the semantics of two mentioned above lexemes (grust’ and gnev) analyzed through the prism of collective introspection of informants. The article purpose is to discuss the case when a semantic description of emotives is given by an expert, which largely uses “the best texts” of corresponding emotions, according to the collective opinion of informants. Our methods include psycholinguistic experiment, corpus and semantic analysis. The research led us to three main conclusions. Firstly, the semantic descriptions of emotives grust’ and gnev obtained in proposed way represent prototypical scenarios of living an emotion in social context and take into account not only the introspective sensations of an expert-linguist, but the interpretative strategies of language users. Secondly, such semantic explanation provides us with keys for explaining, why machine learning technologies are better at detecting anger than sadness in text. Finally, it creates a precedent in using new technologies for making an ecological semantic description of emotive vocabulary. The research results can find application in emotiology, lexicographic practice and didactics.","PeriodicalId":40343,"journal":{"name":"Philological Class","volume":"96 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philological Class","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51762/1fk-2021-26-02-06.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article explores the ways of making emotional lexemes semantic description consistent with interpretative intuition of the ordinary language speaker. The research novelty is determined by the fact that it is based on the data retrieved from the emotional assessment of 3920 internet-texts in Russian made by informants via using a specially designed computer interface. When applied this interface, we can aggregate the weight of 8 emotions (distress, enjoyment, anger, surprise, shame, excitement, disgust, fear) in text. Thus, the data we have used for this publication includes two sets of 150 internet-texts assessed by 2000 informants with the highest score of emotions of distress or anger. The scope of the study covers the semantics of two mentioned above lexemes (grust’ and gnev) analyzed through the prism of collective introspection of informants. The article purpose is to discuss the case when a semantic description of emotives is given by an expert, which largely uses “the best texts” of corresponding emotions, according to the collective opinion of informants. Our methods include psycholinguistic experiment, corpus and semantic analysis. The research led us to three main conclusions. Firstly, the semantic descriptions of emotives grust’ and gnev obtained in proposed way represent prototypical scenarios of living an emotion in social context and take into account not only the introspective sensations of an expert-linguist, but the interpretative strategies of language users. Secondly, such semantic explanation provides us with keys for explaining, why machine learning technologies are better at detecting anger than sadness in text. Finally, it creates a precedent in using new technologies for making an ecological semantic description of emotive vocabulary. The research results can find application in emotiology, lexicographic practice and didactics.
情绪检测与情绪语义:标注文本数据集中的痛苦和愤怒
本文探讨了如何使情感词汇的语义描述与普通语言使用者的解释直觉相一致。这项研究的新颖性是基于这样一个事实,即它是基于从3920个俄罗斯互联网文本的情感评估中检索到的数据,这些文本是由告密者通过特殊设计的计算机界面制作的。当应用这个界面时,我们可以在文本中汇总8种情绪(痛苦,快乐,愤怒,惊讶,羞耻,兴奋,厌恶,恐惧)的权重。因此,我们在本出版物中使用的数据包括两组150个网络文本,由2000名具有最高的痛苦或愤怒情绪得分的线人评估。本研究的范围涵盖了上述两个词汇(grust '和gnev)的语义,通过举报人集体内省的棱镜进行分析。本文的目的是讨论专家根据举报人的集体意见,在很大程度上使用相应情感的“最佳文本”对情感进行语义描述的情况。研究方法包括心理语言学实验、语料库分析和语义分析。这项研究使我们得出了三个主要结论。首先,本文所提出的方法所获得的情感grust和gnev的语义描述代表了一种情感在社会情境中生活的原型情景,既考虑了语言专家的内省感受,也考虑了语言使用者的解释策略。其次,这种语义解释为我们提供了解释为什么机器学习技术更擅长检测文本中的愤怒而不是悲伤的关键。最后,它开创了使用新技术对情感词汇进行生态语义描述的先例。研究结果在情感学、词典编纂实践和教学中具有一定的应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philological Class
Philological Class EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书