Editor's introduction

IF 0.6 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Catherine Warrick
{"title":"Editor's introduction","authors":"Catherine Warrick","doi":"10.1111/dome.12271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This issue of the <i>Digest of Middle East Studies</i> features articles presenting research on a range of timely and important topics, from party politics to foreign policy, political economy, and media representation.</p><p>The performance of Islamist parties in electoral competition and in governance is a subject of long-standing interest, and it has attracted attention anew in the years since the Arab Spring. In particular, political scientists and policymakers have often asked whether the presence of Islamist parties inevitably damages prospects for democracy, and whether electoral participation will result in ideological or political shifts within Islamist parties themselves. Our first two articles offer a reevaluation of some of the earlier political science research on these questions. Justin Curtis assesses the performance of Islamist parties both in elections and in governing coalitions, offering a convincing and empirically grounded argument that seat gains alone are an insufficient measure of electoral success. His new empirical measures support conclusions about both the types of Islamist parties likely to be included in governance and the meaning of such inclusion for democratic systems. Mohamed Saad, approaching the subject from another perspective, seeks to test the well-known inclusion-moderation hypothesis through application to two cases, Iraq and Sudan, where he argues the evidence points to a radicalization, rather than moderation, of Islamist parties. Saad attributes this not only to the parties' political and economic resources, but to the particulars of the two political contexts, in which identity and grievance politics were sources of mobilization for the party and resulted in the continuation of conflict within the systems.</p><p>Mehmet Onder also addresses an issue of enormous interest to policymakers and scholar alike in his study of the effects of economic sanctions on minority groups. His research shows that the imposition of economic sanctions leads the states targeted by such sanctions to enact policies that discriminate against minority groups. He also finds that this result is more harmful to minority groups in cases where comprehensive sanctions are imposed, compared to more narrowly targeted sanctions. This study offers a clear contribution to the further development of foreign policy in the Middle East and around the world.</p><p>The final two articles of the issue both address recent and important developments in Saudi Arabia, although in very different spheres of public life. Tariq Elyas, Abdulrahman Aljabri, Nesreen Al-Harbi, and Areej Al-Jahani offer a study of media representation, comparing British and Saudi newspapers’ visual depictions of Saudi women. Western media outlets have long represented Saudi women as the epitome of the otherness of Muslim and Arab women, shown as hidden and anonymous in traditional forms of dress. But while policies affecting women's rights in Saudi Arabia may have advanced in recent years, these media representations have not shifted equally across outlets; the images in this article from a Saudi newspaper are strikingly different from the British examples.</p><p>Last but certainly not least, a detailed political economy study from Hashem Alnemer addresses the increasingly important subject of the tourism sector in Saudi Arabia. Applying the approach of interpretive structured modeling, this study identifies the set of variables that have the effect of promoting entrepreneurship in the tourism industry, providing an analysis that both enables a more nuanced understanding of this sector of the Saudi economy and identifies particular elements important to the development of policy in this area.</p><p>I thank the authors for contributing these articles to the <i>Digest of Middle East Studies</i>, allowing us to continue to provide empirically grounded research that is both deeply engaged in the academic literatures and relevant to a range of policy debates. I am also very grateful to our peer reviewers, who generously provide their time and expertise in reviewing the research and ensuring the continuation of our high standards for publication. We are pleased to present you with this issue's collection of articles and hope you will find them all interesting and engaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":43254,"journal":{"name":"Digest of Middle East Studies","volume":"31 3","pages":"168-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dome.12271","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digest of Middle East Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dome.12271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This issue of the Digest of Middle East Studies features articles presenting research on a range of timely and important topics, from party politics to foreign policy, political economy, and media representation.

The performance of Islamist parties in electoral competition and in governance is a subject of long-standing interest, and it has attracted attention anew in the years since the Arab Spring. In particular, political scientists and policymakers have often asked whether the presence of Islamist parties inevitably damages prospects for democracy, and whether electoral participation will result in ideological or political shifts within Islamist parties themselves. Our first two articles offer a reevaluation of some of the earlier political science research on these questions. Justin Curtis assesses the performance of Islamist parties both in elections and in governing coalitions, offering a convincing and empirically grounded argument that seat gains alone are an insufficient measure of electoral success. His new empirical measures support conclusions about both the types of Islamist parties likely to be included in governance and the meaning of such inclusion for democratic systems. Mohamed Saad, approaching the subject from another perspective, seeks to test the well-known inclusion-moderation hypothesis through application to two cases, Iraq and Sudan, where he argues the evidence points to a radicalization, rather than moderation, of Islamist parties. Saad attributes this not only to the parties' political and economic resources, but to the particulars of the two political contexts, in which identity and grievance politics were sources of mobilization for the party and resulted in the continuation of conflict within the systems.

Mehmet Onder also addresses an issue of enormous interest to policymakers and scholar alike in his study of the effects of economic sanctions on minority groups. His research shows that the imposition of economic sanctions leads the states targeted by such sanctions to enact policies that discriminate against minority groups. He also finds that this result is more harmful to minority groups in cases where comprehensive sanctions are imposed, compared to more narrowly targeted sanctions. This study offers a clear contribution to the further development of foreign policy in the Middle East and around the world.

The final two articles of the issue both address recent and important developments in Saudi Arabia, although in very different spheres of public life. Tariq Elyas, Abdulrahman Aljabri, Nesreen Al-Harbi, and Areej Al-Jahani offer a study of media representation, comparing British and Saudi newspapers’ visual depictions of Saudi women. Western media outlets have long represented Saudi women as the epitome of the otherness of Muslim and Arab women, shown as hidden and anonymous in traditional forms of dress. But while policies affecting women's rights in Saudi Arabia may have advanced in recent years, these media representations have not shifted equally across outlets; the images in this article from a Saudi newspaper are strikingly different from the British examples.

Last but certainly not least, a detailed political economy study from Hashem Alnemer addresses the increasingly important subject of the tourism sector in Saudi Arabia. Applying the approach of interpretive structured modeling, this study identifies the set of variables that have the effect of promoting entrepreneurship in the tourism industry, providing an analysis that both enables a more nuanced understanding of this sector of the Saudi economy and identifies particular elements important to the development of policy in this area.

I thank the authors for contributing these articles to the Digest of Middle East Studies, allowing us to continue to provide empirically grounded research that is both deeply engaged in the academic literatures and relevant to a range of policy debates. I am also very grateful to our peer reviewers, who generously provide their time and expertise in reviewing the research and ensuring the continuation of our high standards for publication. We are pleased to present you with this issue's collection of articles and hope you will find them all interesting and engaging.

编者简介
本期《中东研究文摘》的文章介绍了一系列及时而重要的主题的研究,从政党政治到外交政策、政治经济和媒体报道。伊斯兰政党在选举竞争和治理中的表现是一个长期关注的问题,自阿拉伯之春以来,它再次引起了人们的关注。特别是,政治学家和政策制定者经常问,伊斯兰政党的存在是否不可避免地会损害民主前景,以及选举参与是否会导致伊斯兰政党内部的意识形态或政治转变。我们的前两篇文章对早期关于这些问题的一些政治学研究进行了重新评估。贾斯汀·柯蒂斯(Justin Curtis)评估了伊斯兰政党在选举和执政联盟中的表现,提出了一个令人信服的、基于经验的论点,即仅凭席位的增加不足以衡量选举的成功。他的新实证指标支持了关于可能被纳入治理的伊斯兰政党类型以及这种纳入对民主制度的意义的结论。穆罕默德·萨阿德(Mohamed Saad)从另一个角度探讨了这个问题,他试图通过将其应用于伊拉克和苏丹这两个案例来检验众所周知的包容性温和假说,他认为,在这两个案件中,证据指向伊斯兰政党的激进化,而不是温和。萨阿德不仅将此归因于政党的政治和经济资源,还归因于两种政治背景的具体情况,在这两种政治环境中,身份认同和不满政治是政党动员的来源,并导致体制内冲突的持续。Mehmet Onder在研究经济制裁对少数群体的影响时,也谈到了决策者和学者都非常感兴趣的问题。他的研究表明,实施经济制裁会导致被制裁的国家制定歧视少数群体的政策。他还发现,在实施全面制裁的情况下,与针对性更窄的制裁相比,这一结果对少数群体的伤害更大。这项研究为中东和世界各地外交政策的进一步发展做出了明确贡献。该问题的最后两条都涉及沙特阿拉伯最近的重要事态发展,尽管在公共生活的各个领域截然不同。Tariq Elyas、Abdulrahman Aljabri、Nesreen Al Harbi和Areej Al Jahani对媒体表现进行了研究,比较了英国和沙特报纸对沙特女性的视觉描述。长期以来,西方媒体一直将沙特女性描绘成穆斯林和阿拉伯女性与众不同的缩影,在传统的着装形式中表现为隐藏和匿名。但是,尽管近年来影响沙特阿拉伯妇女权利的政策可能有所进展,但这些媒体的报道并没有在各媒体之间平等地发生变化;这篇来自沙特报纸的文章中的图片与英国的例子截然不同。最后但同样重要的是,Hashem Alnemer的一项详细的政治经济学研究涉及沙特阿拉伯旅游业这一日益重要的主题。本研究采用解释性结构化建模的方法,确定了一组有助于促进旅游业创业的变量,提供了一种分析,既能更细致地了解沙特经济的这一部门,又能确定对该领域政策制定重要的特定因素。我感谢作者为《中东研究文摘》撰写了这些文章,使我们能够继续提供基于经验的研究,这些研究既深入参与了学术文献,又与一系列政策辩论相关。我也非常感谢我们的同行评审员,他们慷慨地提供了时间和专业知识来审查研究,并确保我们的高标准出版得以延续。我们很高兴向您介绍本期的文章集,希望您能发现它们都很有趣,很有吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: DOMES (Digest of Middle East Studies) is a biennial refereed journal devoted to articles and reviews of topics concerning the Middle East. This encompasses Islam, the Arab countries, Israel, and those countries traditionally referred to as the Near East, including Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Turkey. DOMES is intended for individuals, libraries, research centers, corporations and government offices with interests in the Middle East. The roster of authors and reviewers represents specialists from different religious, political, and subject backgrounds. The scope of materials published or reviewed covers all subjects originally published in English, European, or non-European languages, ranging from books and journals to databases, films, and other media. DOMES includes informational, creative, and critical literary efforts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信